Probably the most hate filled era that earth has ever witnessed, the veritable shit of humanity, like cream from the tit of an ugly beast, rises to the top, to be forced down Our throats until we are reduced to chortling grunts drowning in our own depredation
In the case of the USA two of the most ignorant, unremarkable assholes to have ever won seats at Congress, John Boehner and Mitch McConnell, representing the very last dying gasp of Adolf Hitler’s White Supremacist Nazi Fascist World bowel movement, glorified and popularized, here, by Ronald Reagan - the most miserable worthless stupid son of a bitch that anyone could have ever imagined and worst, the Grand Dragon of the Al Smith Nazi sympathizer anti-Judaics of the Democratic-republican Party, who licked Hitler’s ass and savored every last dollop of his shitty excrement in reward for him bombing London.
And after we don our slip ons, here’s one last kick, square in your collective ass, you stupid Masochistic pigskins of slime; and if anyone has a bucket of shit handy, please, by all means, a last earthly Baptism before their ultimate and long awaited demise, otherwise, nothing would grow over their earthly remains !! and we ought to forget about them as soon as possible
Or, will the Democratics - in the spirit of Al Smith - stand in solidarity with the Nazi fascists?
You see this is the problem, with the Democratic-republican single party monolith there is no clear choice. Their brains were removed and their hollowed sconce was filled with cream of shit from Hitler’s war against communism, or was it USA’s war against the “non kindred races”?
The sooner everyone ends their delusional denial and accepts the reality - that the RayGun Revolutionists are Nazis - then we can finally be rid of them and his legacy of filth, forever.
They are in every manner enemies of nature and the ultimate abominations of humanity. May we show no mercy to those that have elected them to office unless they pick up their phones call their representatives and order them to relent and give President Obama what he wants. The one thing we do have going for US, aside from Natural Justice, is that Our President is better than the people of his party.
Untangling the citizen’s mind from the “conservative party malady”:
I met one of the most ruthless and cold blooded people on earth; one sad part of it is, it was the best thing she had going for her; and yet another is that the Reagan
Revolution made her seem “legitimate”.
Do we need more of these?
So do you pity such individual or the society that would make her ruthlessness seem an acceptable or even salient feature of the citizenry?
Should society unleash her, employ her, so that she may ruthlessly pursue her happiness? Lay her, at the mercy of other individuals “charity”? Or, collectively, care for her
and provide subsistence? She will prey on the former, two, under color of “the conservative cause” to shun the latter.
But alas, only employment, makes her, by definition, less of a mooch
This is a paradox
If a person can afford to gift money, property or usufruct to another, then there is no need for government to subsidize such charity by making it a tax write off. For what
then is such charitable action? Is it selfless sacrifice and giving; or a psychopathic way to avoid paying taxes?
The fact of the matter is, a mooch is a mooch; and what the uber hypocrite Mittney and his McSidekicks McConnell and Ryan are saying, is, leave her to us, private
individuals, because we aren’t paying for no fucking mooches.
They employ her or else throw her away.
My position is, yes you are paying for the mooch, and even if you employ her, she’s still a mooch; because you have made her that way; and I shan’t be bothered, there is no
justice in that; so your only choice is Nazi extermination, mine is to turn her over to government and let her finish her life. Doms in the welfare office will only result in her
being sent back to you
We don’t want psychos in government, so we won’t employ her; and if you employ her then you merely nurture the mooch.
So why would “Liberals” feel compelled to maintain any tax credit whatsoever for charitable giving? It serves no other purpose than to willfully and intentionally deprive
the Federal government of revenue, at a time when we need it the most. Placing this in a light most favorable to the advocates of charitable write offs, would be to consider
them a bribe directed to people that can’t afford such giving in the 1st place. That is not charity, it is a bribe to give money you need for some other use and can’t otherwise
afford or else a bribe to not give money to the Federal government and to feel good about giving and thus accepting it.
All the while the poor hapless psycho bitch stands bye, waiting.
Did society make her this way? Or are there, as psychiatrists claim, biological psychopaths?
To me such idea is nothing more than the sort of Roman Catholic bullshit that brought us the Inquisition. You might as well say Caspar flew into her ear hole or her
spermacist father had bad jizz. Of course society made her this way.
And yet Mittney’s sidekicks claim that government made her this way, by giving her money.
Now I ask you in all seriousness, what is the difference in causal effect between a private individual giving her money or the government? In otherwords how is it that if
she takes money from ‘the Left hand of government’ she becomes a psychopathic mooch and yet if or when she takes the same money from the “Right” hand, she becomes,
Answer: forgotten, since it’s unlikely to happen, thereby augmenting her desperation; and thus she is no longer a good faith pretence for “conservatives” to deprive the
Federal government of money that they themselves acquired through and from the Federal government, since that is where all money comes from; which is why they now
want to “denationalize” money.
Their fetish is not merely dependency but specifically government dependency.
Does this mean that they want to employ psychopaths, in exchange for a tax write off or they want to give them money for a tax writeoff. Make up your mind Mittney -
although I seriously doubt he has one.
So alas we arrive at the threshold of monetary “distribution”:
(1) The Fed issues monetary credit to banks that make it available in the form of loans to business; and then (2) the Federal government taxes the income and profits of
business and makes that revenue available for other things which is left for Congress to decide. The 1st process is known as “The Will of God” and the other, give it to non
business individuals or let’s start some wars on the other side of the globe and send spy cameras to Mars.
The failure to make the disinction between monetary and fiscal policy is the “conservative party malady”, which the MSM’s collective brain is still imprisoned by and thus
all political actions are thereby judged - i.e., by wrongfully imprisoned minds
Which brings us to another paradox, this one regarding “fiscal” redistribution to non business people - which Mittney, McConnell and Ryan have suggested is irresponsible
and evil; and yet fiscal redistribution to business, which Mittney has pledged to do more of in terms of war spending - viz., depriving his private sector Masters of
profits on money loaned to them through Federal distribution and redistributing it to war contractors - must be a corollary to “The Will of God”.
So the fact of the matter is, they are not opposed to redistribution they just don’t want any of it to go to non business people.
The foregoing is the totality of the Mittney, McConnell and Ryan scam regarding charity, mooching and the redistribution of money. They are, in short, psychopathic liars
particularly in regard to redistribution. In reality they don’t like how the majority is doing redistribution, they want it going to business and war; and look what they resort
to in order to roughshod over the alleged 47% they have abandoned as the miscreant part of the population. In essence they claim there is only one right religion, which is the one that says work for the private
sector or you don’t eat; and that you must be bound by this or else you shall be ‘rightfully’ abandoned, in essence, excommunicated; and I guess they figure people are so bad off they’re willing to say fuck humanity, fuck community just give me the fucking money, bitch; and that you’ll vote for the one that promises you that opportunity. So on the one hand, it’s a matter of trust as in who needs collateral? According to them, banks don’t; and on the other, of course you can trust, that they will provide you with the opportunity to say fuck humanity, fuck community and then go get the money from someone else and this is essentially what they are asking you permission to do - viz., the entire distribution of money goes to business and war. If you want any, serve business or join a war; give us this opportunity to give you this opportunity.
So how could I have ever trusted this ruthless woman? Consequently, I lost my life’s savings to her. And how could you ever trust Mittney, McConnell and Ryan? Since the MSM and
the opposition “legitimizes” them as the “republican/conservative alternative”
The key is in realizing that they’re the mooches, they’re the ones taking and not giving - e.g., give us all you have and then do it yourself. Just like she did to me.
And the thing they have in common, is that they’re Americans? Or ruthless psychopaths? Paradoxically, they’re both. But most importantly, you don’t have to give them anything, you’re not getting anything in return, except some transitory feel good as a function of their scam. But most of all? They don’t have to be elected.
So adding to my list of improvements for the USA, here in terms of taxation, I hereby include abolition of any tax write offs for charitable contributions. This wouldn’t affect Mittney’s givings, would it?
Me and my late Father, went to Binghamton to see Pat Moynihan.
I had corresponded with him for a number of years and although I’m sure my Father never met him, when he said “Hi Pat how are you doing” and then introduced himself, it was as if both of them already knew each other, smiling together like old friends. In fact, I pictured them at the club my father was president of, one on either side of the bar, drinking whiskey, talking about history, old times and enjoying it.
That part of politics, between those times, in the 1980s, and now, got lost. Nowadays, it’s all business.
I used to work with a guy on the Street Dept. who used to reminisce. And it’s nice to hear about the past. It serves to level out a sort of sensible continuity that cloaks the mind, like the soothing warmth of a fresh clean blanket and when the pleasure of that was expent, he would say,
“Those days are gone forever”; but in a nice way, like Aristotle would explain, tears of joy, in grieving.
On the other hand, there’s bullshit. And we all know what it is because just as we are about to enjoy each others company, to receive from each other that sort of sensible continuity that aspect of humanity, that cloaks the mind, we instead find ourselves wearing our ‘wow, that’s really fucked up, face’ and saying, what?
Because nowadays, it’s all business, and for the most part, a lot of that business is bullshit.
The immediate policy result, and policy action of US Senator Mitch McConnell (Kentucky) is that policies designed for the yesteryears, and many times long after the authors themselves, are dead, are attemptedly, brought into being, sometimes, far into the future: when and where these policies can no longer have any practical purpose or application and for the most part, actually work a “public mischief” and detriment to Our General well-being.
While society has evolved beyond them; McConnell’s Conservatives, live, in their Romantic past.
You can’t sue them. Because the Democratic-republicans, whom they truly worship and adore, under cover of misnomer and fraudulent appellation, had adopted from Britain and stringently adhere to, the feudalist system of privileged immunity; so that those that follow, their leader, Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, are protected by absolute “legislative” immunity.
But not quite.
Because the one US Constitutional feature they have yet to defeat, although they are delligently working at it, is the ballot box; and it just so happens that Senator McConnell’s time is up and so is Eric Cantor’s of Virginia
Now here these “Conservatives” are talking about dependency, but look who needs the kick in the ass.
The truly remarkable thing, is that out of the 30 National Cities, listed, NYS has only two: Rochester NY and NYC; now compare the NY situation with the neighboring state of Pennsylvania where republicans hold and impose the “kindred” policies and policy actions of Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky (see US Const Art. 1, sec. 10). This is not “states rights” it is an unconstitutional “confederation”.
But getting back to this project, scroll down and see how much $2billion dollars buys and please take notice, this was done under republican Governor Nelson A. Rockefeller. And similar “government spending” projects were also accomplished in California under republican Governor Earl Warren lQQk but if you scroll down in the foregoing link to “history” you’ll see that something changed all of that, at least in California; that’s right, here comes “the Gipper”: garbed in the latest mens fashion of 1947, with the greasy kid stuff and all smiles, he tosses his wrench into the works; and then what did he do? Why he brought that very same wrench to the Federal government (op cit supra, “Other Bridges” or maybe absit is more apropos) went ape shit with GATT and replaced the whole thing with retailing, Pizza parlors and “peace through strength” scroll down in the following link to INFcf., 20 years later lQQk.
So when King of the Mc(s) Ronnie McRayGun took office, the debt was $70 billion short of $1 trillion. $70 billion would buy 35 NYS Office buildings with all of the amenities listed above including 350k jobs - imagine what $1 trillion would do !! Scientific notation confuses me; but between Ronnie and Pappy Bush, they more than tripled the National Debt.
The only time anything like that ever happened was the result of WWI and WWII scroll down in the following link to Appendix.
This is where and when War Spending became the GOPstapo vehicle for their acceptance of the “Committee for the Nation” (-i.e., - Dr. Irving Fisher) so called “Keynesian economics”. This crew always has to have some Vital National Security pretense and once the media does it’s National Duty and gets everyone scared shitless, then the only thing that will save America is to create money to give to private sector defense contractors
“[I]f you want to sum it up in one word, it’s jobs”
One Brief Shining Moment of Truth brought to US by James A. Baker III regarding the War against Iraq lQQk
This is the only way the GOPstapo will do deficit spending and Baker III ought to know because he was Secretary of the Treasury too.
And in the aforesaid “Appendix” link you’ll also see that the debt less than doubled under Clinton with his European War to destroy Yugoslavia and then his Cambodia style bombing of Iraq. Whereafter the doubling of the National Debt was done again under Junior Bush with his full blown war against Iraq and then his war in Afghanistan and who knows where else. Their other common theme is that they all reduced taxes.
Nowadays “bi-partisan” = war.
It’s the new Coolidge corollary. Instead of “America’s business is business” it’s “America’s business is war”. It’s also “The Conservative Malady Paradigm”.
So you are defeated in possibly the biggest landslide in US election history; the USA came out of the depression: how do you save face while admitting that you were wrong?
War spending is dangerous, because it leads to stronger use and addiction - i.e., war; and this is what a very significant number of Democratics were warning against during the Ronnie McRayGun GOPstapo version of “Camelot”, while Ronnie was telling everyone (in his own words) about how “his policies” brought about “the greatest peacetime expansion in US history” … but you don’t hear too many of them anymore. Well now let’s see, way back then there, there was Speaker of the House Tip O’Neil, he musta been one of them there Slovaks and then there was House Majority Leader Tom Foley, hmmm I guess he musta been one a them there American Indians and then the most powerful Democratic in the Senate was Ted Kennedy, yep he was an old limey fur sure !! Now could you imagine that when Barack Obama was elected to the US Presidency, the Speaker of the House, the majority leader of the House and the Senate’s most powerful Democrat were all Black? Why I hardly think anyone would have ever noticed; do you? No one would think there was anything unusual, there, would they? And yet, as ethnic groups go, commensurate to the total population, they are practically equal in number.
And here are these republicans trying to necromancize policies that were already obsolete when they were forced into being by the aforesaid McRayGun and his “bi-partisan” government - viz., get those lazy good for nothing Nigra scabs off welfare because “The Fighting Irish” want to blow the shit out of some non kindred races on the other side of the globe.
“[I]f you want to sum it up in one word, it’s jobs”
Well if you believe in race, like I don’t, then I was one of those non kindred races.
For example, I’d never heard of “The Irish Race of People” until the Public Love affair between Ronald Reagan, Tip O’Neil & co. As I mentioned in other blog entries, the 1st time I saw them was at a Democratic-republican Party Rally and I asked my 1st girlfriend’s Mother, who are those very white people with white hair and noses that look like WC Fields, I had to point out several and then she thought the whole thing was hilarious and told me they were Irish. Otherwise, the only thing I knew about them was that these were apparently the same people that painted their barrooms Green.
Well what the Hell could I possibly know, I’m only a Russian, that’s my D-r ethnicity badge, every D-r has to have one along with how many votes can you deliver otherwise get back in the peasant corrall, you filthy unwashed thing. So I never knew anything about race except that Blues music was referred to as “race music” so almost everything I was to ever know about race I learned from Ronald Reagan because he made a real big deal of it when he was Fuhrer.
So one of the 1st things I learned was that I was purportedly a “White Russian” and the only thing that meant under this foregoing D-r “bi-partisan” race/ethnicity and war deal, is that I was supposed to be a Nazi neo-con working for the GOPstopO to rid the world of Liberalism; aren’t you? lQQk cf., lQQk cf.,:o
So if you want to talk minority, I’m from one of the smallest; and if I’m not a card carrying member of the GOPstapo - which I’m not - and I’m sure as Hell not an Irish, then I must be a Communist, or worst, I must be a Jew !!
Do you realize how much money you allowed these happy Yahoos to waste on this shit?
And they’re still doing it !! in the most grave solemnity.
The thing with War Spending is that a considerable number of people are far more aware of it than they are of USA “Trade losses” because USA Trade losses only became perpetually established when Ronnie “The strong dollar” McRayGun can do no wrong, became “The Teflon President”. Under McRayGun the USA went from being the largest creditor nation to being the largest debtor nation.
That means that USA businesses bought more shit from the rest of the world than the rest of the world bought from USA businesses; and where did that extra money, to buy these things, come from?
No one asked and no one seems to care
This is what RayGun did for “the Gipper”. And whereas Jimmy Carter planted the seeds for RayGun in re anti-Liberalism he did so in regard to war spending too The B-2 Bomber. O look here comes Tippy to dink the deal for the Gipper cf. scroll down to “Congressional Relations” and click the following for additional info on locations.
But clearly, the other side of the “Reagan Revolution” that no one in any news media covers and hardly anyone in Congress even talks about anymore is the rechanneling of income through International Trade and the abolition of tariffs
Tariffs were a form of taxation
But in order to pay them, you had to buy imports. So if you didn’t want to pay the tax you could avoid doing so by simply buying all “made in the USA” products.
But If you tax an import at e.g., 30%, then the domestic producer of the similar product can in turn increase the price of their own product by nearly the same amount, especially if there is no other competing or “substitute” product available.
But the More Important Distinction
Is in the difference between paying or not paying a tariff - that is - when you buy the domestic product, rather than the tariffed import: the extra amount of money in terms of the higher price goes to private sector business, instead of the US government.
This is why anti price fixing laws were established within this period of time
Now if you peruse my blogs and the links, it doesn’t take too great a mind to eventually realize that most of the anti-taxation propaganda that we hear and read today, is merely the old nullification arguments of the Southern states, repeated long after their obvious obsolescene and to the greater detriment of Our General Society. Ironically, this nullification idea eventually resulted in the unconstitutional confederation led by another US Senator from Kentucky, the very same State from whence Mitch McConnell arose.
And today it is this this very same unconstitutional confederation comprised of the new “republicans” and the antifederalist “tea party” conservatives: in the US Senate they are led by Mitch McConnell of Kentucky and in the House of Representatives by Eric Cantor of Virginia. Both presently whine the old RayGun whine “get big government off our backs” so that Mittney can get elected and open the doors to Our Public Lands to their entrepreneur borrowers of denationalized money. The Big Boy Bank customers that want to buy access and then sell the raw resources as exports to the highest bidder. All of which practically amounts to the same position set forth under the idea of nullification- viz., let us sell our unprocessed slave grown, slave picked cotton, in exchange for finished goods from Britain - i.e., don’t tax our imports - “get big government off our backs” !!
When the tariff rate is reduced, the flow of imports will increase, especially if or when manufacturing is decimated; and then the flow of money becomes RE CHANNELED. It still goes to the private sector, instead of the government, but instead of it going to manufacturing and labor, it goes to retailing, low paying jobs and distribution.
Shopping Malls, “entrepreneurs” and Tractor Trailers = RayGun’s “morning in America” !!
The real causes of the National Debt isn’t food stamps. It’s War Spending and continual USA International Trade Losses, year after year after year; and that’s all that reaganomics, supply side economics, trickle down economics, whatever you want to call it, is. It’s the rechanneling of cash flow, tax breaks to the new “entrepreneur” recipients, hence the growth of retailing imports, low paying jobs, consumer credit to facilitate subsistence all of which results in debt, which is continually bailed out/subsidized by the Federal government. The private sector illegally makes the money and then the bail out “legitimizes” it. Under RayGun it was the Savings and Loan debacle and under Bush it was the TB2F(s) and then the whole thing is marketed and everyone else is bribed to accept it with tax cuts, electronic fantasies and illusions of wealth and prosperity while the “winners” take the money and run.
Mittney McConnel and Ryan, boy o boy their palms are all sweaty they just can’t wait to rock n roll, look at that tongue, look at that tail, ruff, ruff !!
The war element in this equation, by now, ought to be “self evident”, otherwise I’ll reserve it, maybe, and do it for my next number, if so then it will be somewhat appropriate, being that the next number is “10”.
The most important aspect of International Trade and Commerce is the settlement of International accounts. People produce things using their own monetary values and thus their price expectations, planning and profit expectations are in terms of their own monetary values.
One of the National advantages the USA has, is that we have one consistent monetary value, consequently all domestic accounts will settle without affecting this value as long as the Federal government remains the sole authority for the creation of money, and that
“[t]he quantity of money created by the agreed authority … bear[s] a direct relationship to the amount of work done or things exchanged in the community”.
(quoting Warburg see Part 6).
In terms of International commerce, this is presently not the case, because (1) there is no fixed World Monetary Unit in which all National monetary values may be converted; and (2) there are varying fiscal, monetary and credit policies within each nation, in terms of their own monetary values and expectations, which affect their exchange rates
The situation, as it stands, is that all monetary units are converted into each other and like any commodity situation the total quantity of a given unit commensurate with the total quantity of other monetary units and the demand thereof, will affect the exchange rates between those units.
Now at various times in recent history, particularly at the end of WWII, it was realized that such a system could conceivably be designed, where there would be a Universal Monetary Unit of settlement. One example is the IMF, where a unit known as the SDR was/is comprised of a basket of various monetary units based on a nations gold reserves. At the present time, and under some controversy from some quarters there is a Bank of International Settlements (BIS) which is located in Basel Switzerland, from whence we receive the various “Basel Accord(s)” which are guidelines for Banks to follow in “hedging” risk (see Part 6, op cit supra, quoting a paper from the OECD).
The major nations of the world are members of this Bank or else participants, which presently “outsource” world settlement functions to yet another private corporation known as “CLS Bank” which uses PVP hedging and a sort of “discounting” which is referred to as “haircuts”. These are allegedly safe forms of instruments because allegedly 94% of them are closed in one year or less; but this CLS Bank is also involved in all of the other forms of hedging that are targeted by the Dodd-Frank Banking law.
Although there is considerable controversy regarding this situation apparently the Federal government has decided tacitly or otherwise that this CLS deal is the only show on earth, while at the same time various non transparent parties in the USA want the Treasury Secretary to grant exceptions to this form of hedging under the Dodd-Frank law all of which has paralyzed the Government from taking any form of action other than to remark. Consequently, as is always the case by which Conservatives rule, which is only by default, this is what the USA is stuck with. And whereas the USA is still on the ‘how many times can we blow up the planet earth’ and send spy cameras to Mars, they are unable to control who settles accounts in US dollars because the GOPstapo won’t let them or apparently they don’t know how.
But I have no doubt that if you elect Mittney, who clearly hasn’t a clue in regard to any of this, he still will have no hesitation in ceding whatever Public aspect of government still exists, over to private, unlisted and untraded untransparent businesses. After all it’s his one consistency in how he does “business”.
The thing that makes this system risky (e.g., how much more debt the US assumes in order to subsidize billionaires fortunes and speculative pastimes) is said lack of a Universal Value; and in conjunction with the other factors described above: the outstanding quantity of all money does not bear a direct relationship to the amount of work done or things exchanged. Now at 1st glance people involved in this sort of thing might be astonished to read that but it is demonstrably true.
In the above part of this blog entry, I posed the question, “where does this money come from” that is, in terms of USA trade losses, year after year after year. The answer to that question is “consumer debt”, which is made possible by Banks; and what sort of asset is that consumer debt based on? Gold? Silver? Treasury Securities? Nope. It’s either based on the value of a house and/or the homeowner’s job.
So to me at least it is readily apparent that there is no corresponding means of settlement in regard to international trade losses, unless they are in some manner subsidized by the Federal government and unless this is paid for with taxes, then it becomes debt. At the present time this shortfall has been “covered” by the banking industry, either in the form of bailouts when the creation of money based on little to no assets inevitably fails - i.e., the government subsidization of wildcat banking so that you can go apeshit at Amazon, and buy your very own “morning in america”.
The D-r(s) and/or the voting public get talked into these scams, where there is clearly no possibility for the settlement of accounts but just have a war somewhere tell everyone how great “America” is have a football game and fly a few Northrup Grummans overhead - while a gaggle of social parasites dip into the flow scoop some of it out and run away.
O it’s peace and prosperity and morning in America, everyone’s a Great Man, until people start asking Hey where’s mine? And then Panic, OMG everyone’s “investment” is lost !! you give us back our money right now !!
So the Basel risk formula devised by BIS, addressed in Part 6 (citing and quoting the OECD paper,) is a means whereby reserve requirements are “avoided” or may be avoided, which means that credit (money) is being created or may be created beyond the limit laid down by law - that is - by the only “authority” that makes money; and this happens because you have two or three levels of private Banks (in two cases not even publicly traded) that are being told - hey it’s cool bro, use our formula, fuck Dodd-Frank, what the fuck do they know; just tell them some bullshit, they’ll never know the difference and they never bust anyone anyway; btw some of these guys are cool they know what’s happening and they’ll just let you slide. But all dinked out in their Boss or Purple Labels, all business with kind and gentle smiles, Alveterzane.
Generally speaking people want to do this because a few of them will cash out while the rest of them get paid and if things get really bad Uncle Sam will bail us out, we’re TB2F too big to fail. So you can protest that, while they stand there with their hands in their pockets, smiling, and then get back to “work” or else you can agree to do something that everyone else in the US can agree to.
As I’ve shown in my past blog entries, so called “Conservatives” adore the present arrangment and want to throw away all of the National advantages we presently enjoy under the Federal Reserve system and want to denationalize money. The reason those want to do that is to use Our government by majority rule to fulfill their “Anarchy, State and Utopia” fantasy and become absolutely independent of the Federal government lQQk. So there will be winners and losers. Think of it as the Yuppie GOPstapo version of Uncle Tim’s “drop out” mantra.
But there’s also the demand of the inflationists. O wow look BIS has an Irving Fisher section !! more money, more money !! by whatever means !!
So after all of this was under way in the 1980s and RayGun had “Committee for the Nation” and Sinclair Lewis written all over him, I sent my plan to various members of Congress, some of whom are still alive some are dead or out of government; but when Bill Clinton became President he was more interested (either by necessity or design) in doing the Southern Dixiecrat version of Reaganomics, just to show the USA that the Democratics were still up to it, I guess. And they were indeed impressed. I have no doubt he’d still be President if US law allowed. And then Biden was onto this World Power foreign policy trip. So the GOPstapo plays Civil War, the Democratics play Fulbright. Because the fact of the matter is, up until the time Bill Clinton was elected as US President, the USA was so deeply in Love with Ronald Reagan OMG I doubt there was anyone the MSM so worshipped and adored, so much so, that it appeared that Nazi fascism would be the perpetual status quo of the USA and by popular approbation - i.e., majority rule/default. So it is doubtful they would have elected any Democratic unless he was white and lived in the South. So whatever the case in regards to factional romanticism, by the time all of this boom boom really went apeshit during Clinton and then in Junior Bushes reign, the Federal government could have collected a fuckload of revenue and averted the financial disaster, altogether, which I saw on the horizon in the 1980s, as did several others, some of whom were/are Democratics.
But nothing was done under Clinton, we had a recession, Gore picked a shitty VP and lost to the Nazi neo-cons. And in the meantime all of these various hedging devices and Basel accords evolved and facilitated the US Banks subsidizing one of the worst of the worst non businesses businesses - viz., mortgages, based solely on planned obsolescent housing and the ability to pay back by the proceeds from a job. So while all of this was going boom boom literally on a credit card, the Banks and the Democratics were just a happy little caduceus but then the inevitable
Why are you letting these people protest, why is big government on our backs, hey what’s the deal, how come we have to carry all the blame !!
The system is pretty simple, maybe someone will steal it again that seems to be the only way things get done anymore amongst the margin mongerers and if they have enough money to buy access maybe someone will pay attention this time. In short the USA has to rid itself of trade losses and cannot do it by exportation alone. But as it stands that’s the D-r plan
The GOPstapo wants their exportation to be like the CSA was - raw materials and the total abolition of tariffs on all finished products. We’ll send the gas you send us the Bentleys. So renew the ‘clear cut the redwoods policy ‘of Our Lord God Ronald McRayGun, sell coal, oil, gas, gravel, whatever they’ll buy. We’re fracking in your cellar it’s a Vital National Security Interest we’re a private business, we’re democracy, and we have to export it. So carbon dioxide will kill the planet? Fuck the planet we want trophy pussy and I’ll be dead before the earth is, so let this motherfucker rip. Mittney Our Saviour !! Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law !!
This is why white guys worship Mittney so.
President Obama presumably wants to do exportation with value added manufacturing, which is really, the only sensible way and that certainly has to be part of the mix but that’s more of an intermediate to long term solution, whereas elect Mittney so he can say “come on down” !! come on fellas we have 4 years to rape pillage and squander and Kid Rock is supplying the music !! parrrrrteeeee.
O look exports have surged, “it’s morning in america”.
Mommy what happened to all of the pretty trees and mountains? President Mittney had to sell them. It’s the Bain Capital way of doing business.
Importation to the present degree is done for one reason - greater margins and greed; and although most of this is seen and discussed in terms of Labor costs, due to our traditional family value of slave mongering and anticommunism - it is also a function of exchange rates. Because of the Kill a Commie for my Mommie traditional family values, it’s popular to piss and moan about China and accuse them of weakening their currency which makes poor helpless margin mongering US importers incapable of resisting purchases of vast quantities of Chinese products (which I have to admit are in many cases fucking awesome) and in turn causing them to retail Chinese imports
It’s a fucking communist conspiracy !! tax amnesty for all retailers
Compare retail mark up to the amount you pay in taxes; and they’re retailing these imports at exorbitant profit margins to a manufacturing barren society where there are no competing products; or else any competing products that do exist are generally unaffordable.
The claim is that this import “phenomenon” is directly attributable to communists subsidizing their exports - i.e., China supports manufacturing and exportation of it’s products and because the D-r(s) won’t allow US to do the same thing then it’s unfair for China to support it’s own national interests because this allows independent tax avoiding greed mongering, margin mongering businessmen located in the US to buy Chinese products. O yeah rah rah lets take a handful of prozac and cheer for that one !!
So what you do instead is establish a system of tariffs based on USA trade losses:
For a trade deficit which persistently exists between the US and a particular country and where that deficit is at least twice the size of US exports to that same nation. I would choose a period of 5 years (unless someone could come up with a period demonstrably better) because it sometimes happens that trade deficits even bilaterally adjust themselves over a course of years (a surplus accrues in one year for one and in another year for the other and over a course of time they balance out); but generally speaking if the USA cannot establish a reasonable balance of trade with that given nation, within a period of 5 years, then a tariff ought to be levied on all products of that nation, in the % amount of the loss to the US.
This must also be seen within the larger tableau, of all major trading partners, because much like the practice known as “netting” there may be some nations with which we maintain a trade surplus and other nations where we maintain a deficit yet amongst all of these nations taken together a NET balance may be realized, which is essentially the goal of my system. Under present conditions, where trade losses, persist, netting (or any similar scheme) cannot work; and in that regard the US (at least) under the adoption of my system would not contribute to the degree of risk otherwise inherent under the present arrangement; which is not to say that others wouldn’t contribute as such, but it’s unlikely it could ever be to any degreee comparable to the USA.
So this system will accomplish one of two things, (1) if the % assessed is small then revenue will go to the Treasury, but that revenue will be hypothecated for the purposes of International Trade and Commerce - e.g., buying an equal amount of that currecny; or else (2) the amount of trade with that nation will recede.
So no particular product is targeted, all products are; and if trade imbalances are the result of currency exchange rates then these tariffs will correct it, independently of, businessmen bringing “fruit” for an audience with various members of Congress.
The other component of my system is to assess a 1/2 to 1% currency exchange tax on all foreign currency transactions involving US dollars.
[Insert stats and quotations]
But if the USA continues on its present course as urged by Ron Paul, Mittney, McConnell, Ryan and other demagogues, that is, in allowing Banks to go the wildcat route and make money based on any assets they fancy, then this National Federalist advantage we enjoy which was practically annihilated under McRayGun will be needlessly lost along with Our government and thus the whole thing will work out as they wish, the USA will then devolve to the CSA or else act in continuous bailout mode similar to the scenario in Europe.
Anyone that is actually serious about doing this denationalization ought to be barred from government altogether, unfortunately the US Constitution doesn’t allow for this (see US Const, Article III, section 3 cf. 14th Amendment, sections 3 & 4) Just don’t vote for them anymore. If they want to be free let them do it on their own and quit trying to steal our government for their own purposes and then claim we’re the ones that can’t help ourselves and are dependent on government. Go off and do something in the private sector, Mittney. Dazzle us.
8 is vertical infinity; but it’s relative; it’s only a symbol.
In part 7 we explored a similar relationship in dependency. The inescapable essence of Bourgeois capitalism: that the owners of production property are dependent upon labor and that labor is dependent upon production property.
The City of Binghamton used to be called “Parlor City”. You can Google it and Wiki up some history, but being from here I knew some of the people and some of the past that’s maybe forgotten or was never known; and I could write up human interest stories probably even a book because quite frankly someone would have to pay me in order to endure that sort of tedium, so let’s further explore this dependency, which so irks and irritates Mittney-Ryan and the “new” republican party
There is Mainstreet, which runs east and west and then heading from the west to east, is then called “Court Street” after it crosses the Chenango River, just upstream, from it’s junction with the Susquehanna.
Binghamton NY, like most populated areas in the US was far more self sufficient before my time. When I was growing up, the latest greatest modern thing was Urban Renewal.
US Trade Policy
But one of the things people often gloss over, while exploring or criticizing urban renewal, is US Trade Policy, which was essentially put on auto-pilot like a lot of things are by the Democratic-republicans, consequently, out moded policies of the past - like war spending - are very often imposed by the same sort of Romanticism that destroyed Our successful 2nd US Central Banking System lQQk. And by the time the King of the Mc(s) Ronnie “the Gipper” McRayGun became Fuhrer, the nearly unanimous view of the Democratic-republicans was that the Smoot Hawley Tariff Bill caused the Great Depression.
Well speaking of self sufficiency, compare current “trade losses” (The volume of imports exceeding the amount of exports by at least two times, over a particular course of time, say 5 years) under the “economic effects” found in the foregoing link.
The problem with Tariffs is that they were always left to languish in a rather crude state. Mr Representative, I got this here business, and I need protection against the superior version of my product which people are importing from a foreign nation, and the reason they’re doing that is because it’s superior in quality and far cheaper in price, than I’m willing to sell my shitty version for, so please, O please, impose a tariff against this foreign import so that I can nurture my infant industry, improve my product, slave drive labor to make them more productive and thus increase my profit margin while still lowering my price.
Well how many votes can you deliver? Wow that many !! ok. And from there this practice evolved into Proud American Tradition, success !! superior American business and know how, capitalism, American Exceptionalism !! &c &c.
Private Sector Dependency
So this is where a great deal of the “dependency” psychology, which Mittney-Ryan like to tap into, comes from. The manufacturing sector of the economy became dependent on protective tariffs; and the tension which allowed this practice to grow, flourish and continue was directly dependent upon “an understanding” between US Representatives and their private sector “constituents” - e.g., make sure you improve your product, keep labor corralled and controlled so you can maintain your profit margin, without raising prices cf Nullification.
So you can go ahead and Romanticize and split hairs all you want, but two of the largest local industries here were Endicott Johnson Shoe Company and International Business Machines. Most of my family worked in Endicott Johnson and the rest of them worked in my Uncles machine shop which did subcontract work for IBM and General Electric. So here’s two brief stories in regard to that.
I used to sweep the floors and clean the machines in my Uncle’s Machine shop and one day he called a meeting and the guys met up in the coffee break area and he had a little tool kit comprised of open end and box wrenches that cost 69 cents. My 1st thought was, shit I’m gonna get me one; and we all looked at the tools and they were actually pretty decent quality and he said “I can’t compete with this”.
The guys grumbled about it for a while and I eventually ignored them because it didn’t seem to affect me
A little while later, me and my brother discovered “Beatle Boots” !! which were sold in the EJ Shoe store but were imported, we wore them and people used to call me a “rat”; and then soon we discovered these really nice side zipped suede high ankle boots with a three inch heel. EJs had nothing like that. The kind of shoes EJ was selling then were just plain ugly - in fact they were the kind of things Calvin Klein sold when McRayGun was named Fuhrer. I saw those and thought what a fucking pervert !! and then the weirdo hair, Tip O’Neil tagging along following him all around, much too much.
EJs died, because they had ugly shoes and the imports were nicer, even if they were a little bit more expensive, it was worth it.
The Road to Radical Individualism
The same time the tariff walls were tumbling down, the Democratic-republicans were tearing down the City, after all, the businesses were gone anyway; and what they ended up with was non self sufficient urban sprawl, because previous to this time manufacturing was crowding out other forms of self subsistence: domestic products were being imported into already established areas; and this was thought of as progress. But then when this “growth” petered you were left with lots of
houses, churches and bars and the Democratic-republicans arguing over how to make it work.
Well it doesn’t take too much imagination: if you have a crowd of people and you give them money they’ll live on $4.00 bologna sandwiches on white wonderbread and $1.00 cup of Kool Aid (spike mine please, well on second thought) that is, as long as you have guys like Mittney-Ryan selling it to them as a part of the M-R private sector American Dream.
A sensible tariff policy is possible but I’ll save that for my next number
Getting back to Hawley Street. When I was growing up it was a narrow side street lined on either side with small store fronts, mostly empty, much like Main and Court Street are today.
One of the things I liked about having money was being able to buy nice clothes at reasonable prices. Something that is impossible for me today. It was nice having a new shirt to wear, the fit, the color coordination, like people you see in government and on sports and news shows. And one of the things I noticed after EJs died and IBM left, was that the clothes stores left too and then a lot of old people were walking around in blue jeans and flannel shirts and some of them didn’t look so good; but in the meantime, something happened.
Went beyond the demolition part of Urban renewal, widened Hawley Street and made new government buildings, new parking ramps and eventually, people started dressing nice again, businesses started opening up around the parking ramps places for GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES to eat lunch, have coffee maybe even after work with drinks. That was made possible by Democratic-republicans, but under Mittney-McConnell-Ryan, it would have never happened cflQQk.
Dear Mittney, get a fucking clue: a super majority of citizens don’t want to trade stocks, options, or if you follow your RTTV, gold and silver or whatever 5 days a week for all the rest of our lives to pay for food, shelter, doctor bills, &c. So we use Our government to avoid having to do that. This is why you are losing.
Why don’t you start an investment newsletter and get the fuck out of politics.
I like how the USA is now much better than it was under the Nazis, mostly because I don’t feel pressured to trade stocks, options, or if you follow your RTTV, gold and silver or whatever 5 days a week for all the rest of my life. Instead, I can jerk off with my friends on the internet, work around my yard plant flowers and take it the fuck easy while your private sector parasites increasingly fade away.
It’s finally feeling like the Government of the USA is Our government; and I think that’s what you and your people find so disturbing; but this government does not become “your” government if you find 7% or whatever amount of the voting population you think you need to defeat the Black guy that is now the President of the USA. And it’s just that sort of majoritarian mentality of yours that is the real problem, because you and your people truly believe that Our government becomes your government if you win the election.
In short, Mittney, white people will vote for the Black guy that happens to be President of the USA in order to keep Our government rather than voting for the white guy and losing it forever.
So we take your money away, and hand out bottles of MD 20-20 to street people, you’re a financial genius, quit being so lazy and get your worthless gold brick ass back to trading stocks and options, gold and silver, whatever, like you expect us to do, or else die. J/k kidding Mittney we’ll cyber you some food credits if you can’t make it anymore.
So why doesn’t someone ask this Mittney person the following questions:
1) Are you sure that you want to be the President of the USA?
2) Whose government is the government of the USA?
3) And as a follow up, if He would actually concede that the government of the USA is the government of the citizens of the USA, then ask Him: what it is that makes Him
think that we aren’t allowed to use Our government for Our own purposes?
The problem in this regard, is the Democratics’, but it’s a sort of vicarious liability shared with the MSM (mainstream media) which made it practically impossible for President Obama, who tried to address this issue, to continue the dialogue in any meaningful fashion. So if you want to discuss the significance of Mittney’s 47%, that’s the gist of it, as further exploded herein.
Since the D-rs are allowing the Banksters under Austrian School authority to counterfeit money then I’m going to metaphorically coin the phrase the “conservative paradigm malady” which is the MSM routine of playing to the so called Right Wing, as if a Right Wing is something that actually exists beyond TV programming. So if you really care about any of this beyond, Hey just doing my “job”, then the nodule of import, here, is this notion of ‘taking care of yourself’.
Grow the fuck up. Nobody takes care of themselves.
In the USA, all of us are forced into reliance on the private sector and the private sector is likewise reliant upon us. If you have more credit than the average person then
it’s a little easier for you to support your habit(s), but you still need dealers so it’s only a matter of degree.
For the most part, the private sector is dependent upon us, as labor, as in the Bourgeoisie and the Proletariat.
In that regard, the greater number (labor) are makers and the private sector are the takers - viz., they take our labor and give us what they’re willing to give. The reason
they can do this is similar to what is known as ‘a prescriptive right’ they own production property, we don’t; and in many cases “their” production property was bought and
will continue to be bought with denationalized money - just like common counterfeiters - via the TBF Banksters.
Want some timber have Jaime print up some of His brand of money for you and buy it from President Mittney. O you don’t know Jaime? Awwww. Well the timber used to be Ours but now it’s “privately owned”. This is called “privatization”. The Banksters make their own brands of money, sell it to a 1%er and He buys what used to be Ours (Public Lands) from President Mittney. Open the doors come right in fellas, we have at least 4 years to loot the nation.
We don’t own any production property unless it’s Public and that’s the only way we’ll ever be able to afford to own any. The D-r(s) will never allow us to organize and take it. So all we have is our government and our indentured servitude to the propertied class, and then with whatever they are willing to give to us, which is increasingly less as “security” is “enhanced”, is all that we are allowed to have not by Our government but by His private sector; and now He wants to make Our government His. So you can God Bless America all you want to but if you keep voting for Mittney’s it’s all going to be owned by somebody else and it ain’t going to be God.
They give us what they’re willing to give and we have no other choice than to take it and then we in turn give that money back to the private sector - i.e., the foodliner, the private doctor, the private hospital, the private mortgage banker, all of which, we pay for by Our labor.
So the issue, if any, is how do we pay for it?
There are only two ways
(1) from our absolute dependence on what amount of money the private sector master/mistress of the propertied class is willing to give to us, which we in turn must give back to their private sector brothers and sisters or
(2) according to Mittney, from whatever amount of money we give to Ourselves, through Our government by taxing the private sector.
OMG :O they’re still allowed to tax the private sector !! :OMG Mittney you have to get elected, you have to stop them :O
Mittney’s real issues are at least translucent if not transparent:
He and His people are opposed to labor unions only because they interfere with what your master/mistress of the Propertied Class is willing to give to US, and even though that amount, whatever it is, still goes back to their private sector brothers and sisters !!
He’s agin’ it
Another aspect of this is that Mittney and His people are upset that Our government has a food stamp program, which again, directly subsidizes His private sector brothers and sisters. Their complaint in this regard is that the indentured servitude requirement for nourishment (food stamps) can’t be adhered to without exterminating people because
(a) His people won’t allow the government to provide jobs for US
(b) while His Holy Sacred private sector is unwilling and obviously impotent in this regard.
So like the Ron Paul audience on the health care question, ‘should we just let them die’, the colliseum arose !!
But the simple irresistible fact of the matter, is this, we the people of the USA, are completely and totally dependent on the private sector, for our very existence; supposing there was any truth to the case, as Mittney asserts, then His alleged 47% of the citizenry, that are purportedly dependent on Our government, rather than on His private sector, still have to give back whatever money we get from Our government to the private sector.
So it’s like, what the fuck is this poor hapless Mittney-McConnell-Ryan conglomeration talking about?
I ought to just leave you there duh, like your GOPstapo does
From the best I can discern, and I really hate to be “articulate” on their behalf, they’re saying that the private sector is over taxed by Our government while at the same time Our government allows labor unions to ruthlessly force the propertied class into paying US amounts of money which they find unjust and immoral. In short, that Our government robs Mittney’s people by taxation and allows the labor unions to done ruin their Nigras !!
So they need government assistance, O Lordy they can’t make it on their own, they need Mittney. O Lordy O Lordy please O please give us Mittney.
Keep diggin Mittney, he’s way down there now, ‘cause we kin hear his fading echo - what’s that? O, he’s opposed to “redistribution”
Snap, it’s that gotdam robin hood, terrorizing Sherwood Forest, again. Obama in tights is robbing Mittney’s people of their denationalized money by taxation !! and giving it to these filthy low life lazy good for nothings, taking it easy, minding our own business, fucking around in the garden, whom in turn immediately hand it over to His Holy Sacred Private sector, anyway.
Here take the gotdam money, I have gardening to do.
So like, really, what the fuck is Mittney talking about?
“What are they protesting about, no one seems to know”
And in the end His private sector gets all the money anyway. I guess maybe they feel they don’t have a fair chance at skimming some of it off for themselves under present arrangements?
Ok Mittney, I’m feeling sorry for you again. especially after you ran down that kid and cut off his hair, what a guy.
Mittney, you’re after that thankfully diminishing class of young white men that your people tried to force Black men into becoming too; which is another product of the “conservative paradigm malady”.
Lauren Lyster had some Libertarian college professor on her show the other day talking about how welfare ruined the Black family, he claims that The Black Family was fine before government got involved. It was a sort of neo-Moynihan report with some considerably twisted “facts” and logic; but anyway, the chances of you getting shot, or at least beaten for saying “you ought to have your husband blow his buddy in front of you, it’ll make him more understanding of women’s issues” was less likely before the 2010 Tea Party landslide and still is but that could change.
When I was growing up the peer pressure was, still, you have to get laid, Heterosexually, if you don’t want to it’s ok, we’ll get you drunk and find some poor lonely fat girl and we’ll gang bang her with you and then we’ll stagger around with our arms all over each other but it’s ok we’re not fags it’s because we’re drunk and you just got laid. Well most guys know the scenario; and this was a sort of coming into “manhood” thing; anything was better than cocksucking or cuddling with your buddy’s beautiful soft warm creamy tender ass, just ask your peers’ fist. Or you could be in Love with “sluts” and take similar shit which was like one step up from being a cocksucker. You gonna let her get away with that shit, Hey we fucked her last night. She wasn’t raped she wanted it. So a lot of that started to fade and of course Mittney and His Nazi GOPstapo Rush Limbeaus, Rick Sanatoriums are frantically doing all they can to preserve it. But it also changed in the time leading up to the Gay Marriage thing. Guys tried cock sucking and other same sex stuff because the atmosphere made it easier. Some of them liked it some of them thought yeah it’s ok but I like pussy too or I like pussy better, whatever. But there is less of a patriotic duty to beat fags, rape sluts and generally abuse people for Loving; but now there’s a new impetus, force Gay people to get married - e.g., O you’re not married, still fuck around then, huh, you fucking slut, OK vote against AIDS research. Now this guy is a fag but this guy is the kinda Gay we kin lurn ta like. This guy’s Black but this one is definitely a Nigger. Same mentality. So when you grow up/live in that paradigm along with here jerk off while you look at “Playboy Magazine” - you are programmed and directed into the idea, that you need to buy a trophy wife, which takes a tremendous amount of money, you need clothes, a car, a home, cash to travel, impress, buy gifts, dadada; and now the only alternative is reborn, you can become a middle class Democratic; but only if you work hard, obey and follow the rules. So the period from 20 something drooling hardon to settling for “a nice girl” became an essential part of “the economy” and when you’re a young 20 something kid with a perpetually drooling hard on with pretty women all over television, which you are led to believe, you’ll find in vast quantities in Metro areas, all you need is a job: then eco 101, Austrian Economics, Kindler and Gentler Nazis, trading silver and gold makes a lot of sense at least as hmm here’s another angle all of which leads to heavier use like np I’ll be a millionaire and then I’ll be able to buy a trophy wife. So 1st it was Rock n Roll and then it was let’s hire 20 Mule Team Brill Cream for Pres !! and then it was Rock n Roll has got to go and then Rock Star became trading stocks or Mittney at Bain Capital and now it’s being a Bankster like Jaime Dimon: who is kind of an ug but hey 20 something guy with the drooling dick do you know any pussy you want that wouldn’t fuck him in a minute; but let me ask you would you jerk off while you watch or get jealous? Would you Love her afterwards or call her a slut or both? So the trick for Mittney is how he handles these drooling hard ons that nobody wants to talk about or relate to; but the orgasmic climax to this hole thing is - what do you have for them to insert all of those drooling 20 something dicks, now in your hands, into, Mittney? You just gonna jerk um off forever? How do you get these guys from jerking off to porn to real live trophy pussy, even if they are “escorts”. Where do they get that kind of “spending money”? Needless to say, Mittney has his hands full
So it’s not a matter of being lazy or as Holy Paul says “complacent” (next they’ll be airing old Kennedy clips) it’s just eventually realizing that whatever you cum up with, Mittney, is a fucking con. Literally !! otherwise you’re going to have to buy an awful lot of pussy for these guys and probably have to buy a shitload of some cute ass guys too.
So to finally finish off … at the end of the following “Capital Account” show with Lauren Lyster, the alleged “producer” some 20 something drooling dickhead named Demetri, spilled his erm guts on his advocacy of the Austrian School/Ron Paul/GOPstapo scheme to denationalize the US Dollar which he promotes and advocates along with Wildcat Banking - this is addressed in detail in Prt 6 (my previous blog entry); but essentially the people behind this scam want to allow the TBF Banksters to issue their own brands of money, like credit cards. This was done before in the US and led to the greatest financial fiasco possibly in the history of people (see Prt 6).
The whole thing is quite revealing since FOX/GOPstapo used to allege that RT and particularly their former news persona Alyona is a communist and that RT is a communist conspiracy to destroy the USA. Wow, what better way? than to destroy the US dollar !! and ironically it seems to be the same conspiracy !! except that the real “Mastermind” behind it is Mittney, his GOPstapo and their TBF Banksters. Could it be that Mittney is paying for these shows? Maybe Karl Rove? The Koch Bros. Sheeesh :P I suspected the whole thing was bankrolled by Ron Paul or that SDS guy that Thom Hartmann works/worked for Lyndon LaRouche but I guess they’re all the same thing, right. Hey Rupert, you gonna buy um out :)
As a continuation of my last blog entry, which was inspired from a Monetarist discussion on the Chris Hayes show, I made an earnest attempt to wake up @ 7:30
am to watch his show on June 16, 2012 to see if my blog had any impact
The fact is I’m still recovering from 1st and 2nd degree burns and have to change dressings twice a day, by the time I showered and did that it was 9am, but still it would have been at least 8:30 by the time I got primped. After the show I made breakfast did a few necessary chores sat down for tea around noon, came back here did some Tweets and started writing. No matter how it turns out I can only work at most 4 to 6 hours a day, after that some essential aspect of life becomes sacrificed and eventually everything gets all fucked up and needs a period of adjustment. Of course if I had maids, a cook, somebody to do laundry - although i seldom dress - I’d probably still only have 4 to 6 hours in me, so I consider an 8 hour day especially for 5 days a week to be an exercise in abject sadism. Indentured servitude is bad enough
Writing to these media people is almost as bad as writing to the government; with
the latter, you sometimes receive a form letter response.
This is an exercise of the “Hope” concept.
And then you wonder how much freedom do these persons have apart from what “the board” might impose as - ok boy here’s the stories you can cover.
Unfortunately, I only made the better part of the last hour, where the discussion appertained to decentralized news - no more Walter Cronkite and “central
Central is always ok when the Holy Sacred Private Sector does it, but if it’s even suggested at the Federal orbit OMG those filthy Nigra Loving Commie
It’s the Fed !!
Well the reason that is, in large part, is because Thomas Jefferson’s Democratics, propagandized and programmed the populace, apparently evolved beyond that; and being that the GOPstapo picked up the disaffected, they now use the same rhetoric the Democratics used to use to the already indoctrinated
masses and ut O here comes HS Thompson’s astute observation regarding Democratic atavism. It’s like they feel guilty about accepting evolution.
The Fabulous Amy Goodman, however, mentioned retailers - Brava - having made a considerable fortune in the RayGun import Elysium years, which is seldom
discussed, unless amongst stock equity traders; but Amy and Chris associated retaling with the bottom 30% of the population.
And then suddenly
Cyber Autoban, Redline, speed shifting, blurred plethora, of high rev, valve floating, screaming commercial advertising - after which, it’s like - what? Were
you, talking about something? What show is this?
Now see, you used to think that Pot caused that to happen, when all the while, it was Bourgeois advertizing,
Which is heavily subsidized by tax writeoffs
Now the funny thing about Americans is that they measure everything by how many dollar$ you collect or have, which was the same when Pat Moynihan wrote in
his infamous report [p]’where the worth of man is determined by the size of his paycheck’, way back then there in the remnants of the JFK
In that regard, nothing has changed in, prit near, 50 years !!
I was born in the USA, but the ruling class will never consider me, as, “An American”; having been condemned by de facto Bill of Attainder for attempting to
be a pro se litigant in a Conservative controlled Judiciary, and having no children to work a corruption of blood, there’s really nothing I can do about that
arrangment - unless I become ruthlessly rich - which brings us to the point, unless we emulate Donald Trump, we are not represented.
Well Chris and Amy discussed this briefly, in terms of the news. Unfortunately, that’s as far as it went and this is the reason:
Americans just won’t face the simple fact, that the real issue is ownership. Now this might have been minutely touched upon before the way too many
commercial advertizing brain flashing Maypo mush, so characteristic of MSNBC, which has little pieces of “programming” in between; or, which is which?
What can we do to lower the deficit? Exterminate the poor, let hospitals kill those that happen to wander in - you know, the usual McConnell & co. talk
faire at their various cross burning coffee cake “Conservative” gatherings; but O Dear, O most Holy, White Xtian Saviour, please, do not allow those Commie
Liberal Nigra Loving Queers to cut the tax write offs for advertizing.
It might conceivably hinder growth.
Now there is a sensible and useful question which the government can readily answer - how much revenue would the Federal government realize if all tax
deductions for all types of advertizing were eliminated?
But the idea is so utterly blasphemous, to the Democratic-republican single party monolith, they’d rather say, fuck, or use the terms Bourgeoisie and
Proletariat before they’d discuss the real issue of ownership.
Fucking awesome, force the issue, i want to hear them say “fuck” on CBS primetime
But what is this advertizing? I can remember from my college Microeconomics textbook, previous to the RayGun Revolution, where economists and prominent
people - even businessMen and others not considered to be Commie Terrorist Negro Muslim Queers, were actually questioning this - viz., does advertizing
actually work and even if it does why should the Federal government be subsidizing it.
Why not ask Mittney?
A good reference point is the TV advert Ed Shultz does on MSNBC, where he’s standing on the street of a modest residential neighborhood, talking about “the
middle class”. Well I live in a little barracks style neighborhood like that but I don’t consider myself middle class I consider myself one step up from
sliding into dilapditation and then straight onto a place at the side of a burn barrel with a 1/2 pint of MD 20-20. But again this is a function of measuring
worth by the size of your pay check? Or is this really closer to the real issue of ownership. And here’s another question the Federal government can readily
How much of the USA populated area is comprised of these types of neighborhoods?
Now the area I live in was incorporated in 1892, but did not adopt a comprehensive zoning plan until 1974; and if you can still find an old map from as
recently as the 1990s, the various areas designated outside of three lot sized single and multifamily residential areas are Agricultural areas, with separate
areas designated for commercial and industrial enterprises. So if there was no zoning ordinance and no planning board, how did these neat little staggered
drive-wayed lots and minute homes come about?
The private sector did it !! the Holy Sacred Wondrous Uber Mightly “Invisible Hand” !!
Which was the Endicott-Johnson shoe factory. We need labor, import those Honkeys, now, and bed um down.
This is not unique. Go to Google Maps or some other similar service and type in various residential addresses and check out the area. I can tell you that,
here, almost all of those Agricutural Areas have been filled in with various types of “homes”. So if there’s no Ag areas where do all of these Happy
Heterosexual Fuckers get their food from? I had a Biology professor that used to ask people “what do you do with your garbage”. Most would say - put it on
the curb !! The same sort of question applies to food. The supermarket.
This is one of the most profound of all general realities of the USA - next to the interstate highway system - it emcompasses both the questions of
ownership, the question of economy as well as monetarism; but most incredibly - or for the wise, familiar with Democratic-republican process of government,
not so incredibly - it’s never discussed.
But what you have here is a form of imprisonment. None of us have access to the earth, not even collectively nor by a local division of labor. A supermarket
comes into town, drives out all of the little Mom and Pop operations, Happy Heterosexual Fuckers, buy up the farm land and we’re trapped with the supermarket
and that’s the only place where we get our food from. No place to hunt, no place to fish, no place to farm. When I was a young man there were still vegetable
farms and at least edible corn with stands where you could buy these things and close enough so you could walk to them too. I used to get 25 and 50 pound
bags of wheat grown in NYS and have it ground locally into flour. That service is no longer available and I can’t afford a reliable stone mill. Although I
make my own bread I have to get pre ground wheat, although regional, it’s not as healthy as it is freshly ground. The point is, food has to be imported and
if there is nothing to export, you have a trade deficit - i.e., more money is going out than is coming in, whch means there’s less in circulation, making it
more dear but ultimately, where does it come from?
As I’ve discussed in other blogs, in areas of self sufficiency - and no area is absolutely self sufficient - there is less need for money. In areas of less
self sufficiency and aside from much higher prices, there is a greater constant need for money, which is continuously leaking and thus such a locality needs a greater means
for the generation of real value or some other means which creates a balance of monetary circulation - e.g., tourist trade.
The problem is that many of these communities which could have been saved in the 1970s and even 1980s became more deeply entrenched as manufacturing
dwindled; and as an immediate result, these communities, particularly these neighborhoods, no longer made any sort of economic sense. And on top of that, the republican faction
made a thoroughly insane attempt to maintain communities that came into existence by the value added from manufacturing, by having people borrow money to
spend at retail shopping malls. It would be like pickers setting up tent next to a supermarket parking lot, because there used to be produce to pick; but
instead of the Democratic-republicans saying - hey, wtf are these people doing? Are they nutz? they essentially subsidized them to just go on through the
motions and, here, have some ice cream, soft drinks and pizza while you just stand there, waiting, I guess; in short, compounding the amount of money
demanded for which there is no return.
So the next question which government can readily answer is - how much of this demand is for subsistence as opposed to cell phones, cyber murder games and
for that matter gasoline - that you can’t drink.
Now President Obama wants to bring about “an economy that lasts” and also wants to “bring back manufacturing jobs from overseas” and “rebuild the
infrastructure” also “to hire teachers”
Well the problem with infrastructure is creating further imprisonment. Notably, how you determine where it is needed, the most, is entirely dependent on what
you want it for. This is why I suggested the imposition of energy quotas in lieu of Federal and State taxation. Business would still be required to buy
energy the same as they do now, except the quota would be used to fulfill the “reasonable” needs of The People; and the infrastructure would be built for the
most effective economic delivery of that energy which business would benefit by as a spinoff. This would also attract new business to those areas - i.e., a
direct and immediate energy source is hereby available to you if you decided to locate here. Leaving that aspect to the private sector
The way this is set up now is biased towards an obsolete business model - e.g., O there’s business there, so they’re customers for energy. The new model
would be, there’s communities of people there, that have no means of economically obtaining energy, and if you as a manufacturing concern, locate there, then
you’ll already have a ready source of energy and a population of prospective employees.
That’s just one part of the example; but generally if you want to bring manufacturing into distressed areas, the sorts of infrastructure building that’s
preferable is one that is oriented 1st to the “reasonable” needs of The People and also the carrying capacity of the area - e.g., is this area large enough to
support the habits of Happy Heterosexual Fuckers, encouraged to ignore Planned Parenthood common economic sense and make as many babies as possible. One of
the very most important aspects of infrastructure planning; as well as such things as to whether railway is feasible or pre-existing, then how about adding
passenger service if it doesn’t already exist. This is especially important for tourism. People may conveniently have a myriad of destinations, alleviating
air demands as well as highway demands.
While at the same time discouraging the population of areas where it is uneconomical to route water, energy and other necessities, like air conditioning. If
people want to locate there with their SUVs, pet animals and children gaggles then they’re on their own, let them enter into Holy Sacred Matrimony with the
private sector and they can be the new bitches of the WCHPs (White Christian Heterosexual Patriarchs).
But if you keep going this same route as the one you’re on, now, you’re going to have the same problems that you see now with unemployment; especially with
all of this supra family values encouragement from the present administration, in competition with who can be more Conservative, the hyper increase in the
population which will unnecessarily and assuredly result from this insanity is going to geometrically increase the amount of money demanded for new
generations repopulating already entrenched areas.
If you want to remain reliant on private business, then the only solution is to have the Federal government provide subsistence to the populace. This will
lower wages, lower taxes and allow business to do it’s own thing, alleviating the burden of forcing the private sector to provide subsistence, which it is
clearly incapable of doing. Keep going this same route of increasing reliance on the private sector and you will destoy all that remains of it, just like you
did with manufacturing.
The only alternative is to quit the Democratic faction and have everyone be a republican, because the republicans already know all of this the only
difference is they do not care about those they consider ‘not real Americans’ the same as their Nazi brethren. The real question in this election is
whether the Democratics are any different or whether they just pretend to be in order to get elected. And make no mistake here, maybe the Democratics really
believe that “staying the course” - in terms of policy - someohow helps these people in some way other than how I’ve described, even though it makes them
miscreants; unfortunately, the republicans, on the other hand, are just going to keep doing whatever they can for those they consider “their own” and for
whatever remains of business and tax cuts for the 1%.
The Democratics might truly appear to suck swipe as far as you’re concerned. Personally I am not overly excited about them either but the alternative is truly a
nightmare. I lived most of my life under the Fascist dictatorships of the GOPstapo and White Southern Democratics and can assure you, that the result of
voting to re-elect Barack Obama and voting for a Democratic House and Senate could never be worse and never even be as bad.