In case you missed it, or just didn’t bother, here’s the actual decision
The gist of it is relatively easy to understand.
Congress passed the The Religious Freedom Restoration Act in 1993 (hereinafter referred to as RFRA) which they declare was designed and intended to allow Peyote to be used in religious ceremonies.
Congress thus used the General Government to create a particular exception to laws that make the use of Peyote a crime.
Did you get that? It’s a crime unless it’s used for religious purposes.
And then 17 years later Congress passed Obamacare, which according to The Court purportedly imposes particular mandates on various employers but not on others.
Presuming this declaration of the Court is true then right there such discrimination is “suspect” i.e., what is the governmental “compelling interest” to treat the general group “employers” in some particular and thus ungeneral way?
So here again we have The USA Democratic-republicans (hereinafter, “The Party”) using the General Government to do ungeneral things, which invariably leads to a hotch potch of bullshit:
Various Conservatives opposed Obamacare, in part, on religious ground and Obama, as Liberals always do, knuckled under and submitted to them by promising “religious exceptions” to health care.
Are these exceptions what Congress originally passed and he signed into law?
No mention is made of the specifics of this in the decision, instead the Christian 5 hearken back to a law passed 17 years before; and it appears to me that that legislation overtly declared in the decision is actually interpreted based on another law passed another 17 years earlier.
So the premise suppressed in the majority enthymeme is their view that the official policy of the US Government is to deny the government from making money available to pay for abortions; but they don’t openly say that nor do they say whether this was addressed in the actual Obamacare legislation as enacted into law.
This case, generally known as “Hobby Lobby”, accommodates and then enhances from the bench an implied extension of The Hyde Amendment ideology; but when these religious objections were asserted in regard to Obamacare, the Court suggests that the other gutless Liberals, in reaction to Conservative opposition, buck-tailed it under pretense of, “he’s our President”.
And speaking of gutless Liberals (if you could even call him that) the above tweet by Harry Reid appears to confirm that assessment.
So it would indeed seem that In order to avoid any religious issue, Congress unconstitutionally delegated Legislative authority to HHS to essentially complete the legislation under pretense of writing the rules and one of these “rules” was found to involve birth control.
And now instead of actually fixing this matter by issuing general legislation as Congress is supposed to do, Reid complies with this ideology of creating religious exceptions and thus knuckled under to the Conservatives along with President Obama.
Conservatives, petitioned the Court claiming that the HHS rules rather than the law they were designed to implement deprived them of religious freedom; and they proceeded to take this rant all the way to the US Supreme Court, which regularly denies review of countless cases involving the actual life of human beings, general human liberty and the property of poor people and other “undesirables” in general, but was absolutely thrilled to accommodate this one petition which involved an asserted claim regarding the “religious beliefs” of corporate capitalists; and alas
The Court decided that the HHS rules, implementing Obamacare, allow corporations to enjoy the same exceptions to the law that HHS granted to churches and other religious corporations.
No matter which way you look at it, the only one that has authority to make such exceptions is Congress.
So you can blame Congress for being too Holier Than Thou to simply make the use of Peyote legal and for holding The Hyde Amendment Holy Sacred Untouchable and beyond the reproach of human beings: as Conservatives clearly consider it as an Amendment to the New Testament. But you can also blame HHS and Obama- Biden scroll down to “related law” in the link in re including all of these unnecessary exceptions and now add to that list Reid and his Democratics in the US Senate - e.g.,
Now as a “nicety” of the law and in regard to stare decisis, the 5 man majority relies on the “Legislative intent” of RFRA to impose a “compelling interest” standard for anything that is declared an abridgment of “religious freedom”; but don’t get lost in the sophistry, because there still has to be some authority - some basis in the actual legislation which the rule in question “rationally” carries out to thus implement the legislation rather than Andrew Jackson’s Chief Magistrate theory - i.e., I don’t give a good gotdam what Congress passed and what I signed, this here is what Thy Will Be Done !!
Maybe this is what Jaggin’ Johnny Boner &co is whining about in their lawsuit against Obama? Jackson’s Chief Magistrate Theory?
And Reid like some candy assed idiot is now supplying that ground by legislating religious exceptions, which doesn’t change the Court decision it actually affirms it.
Congressional Delegation of Authority to write rules which have a rational basis in the legislation is entirely Constitutional, delegating Legislative authority is not. In this case, HHS appears to have based these exceptions solely on the promises made by the President, not on the actual legislation that was as passed by Congress and signed into law by the President. So Reid is merely providing that omission and in doing so is doing nothing more than covering the asses of the President and the 5 man majority on The Court - i.e.,
Why should a church have the power to prevent an employee from being provided with the same health care coverage afforded to any other employee?
The health care coverage is designed and intended for the benefit of the employee, not the employer. It’s just one more cost of doing business in the USA - viz., being allowed, encouraged and protected in the ruthless exploitation of humanity, for profit.
Is that a National Religion?
The employee is paid to do a job not to accept the religious precepts or pass the religious test of an employer.
But if you’re a church or some other religious corporation, HHS decided that you may then do whatever you want in order to not provide coverage to any of your employees for birth control, which the 5 man majority wrongfully extended, by implication, to “for profit” corporations.
The following is my further basis for saying that this action of the 5 man majority is wrong:
The ordinary way the “strict construction doctrine” works is that when a statue, rule or ordinance deprives a person of Life Liberty or Property and a compelling interest is shown to do so
[e.g., there’s too many people, which is inimical to the general welfare, especially when poor people create more people because they can’t pay for them; and birth control is clearly the least restrictive means of furthering the compelling governmental interest of voluntary population control]
Then the provision of depriving the person of that right or privilege cannot be extended beyond that compelling interest, because it will encroach upon the right reserved to the person, which in this case deprives employees of benefits conferred to them under the law by extending the HHS exceptions by implication - i.e., their ‘reasoning’ goes: if the HHS exception extends to the protection of the individuals in a not for profit corporation, association, etc, then it shall also extend to religious people in a for profit corporation; and the only ground declared by The Court for imposing this extension of exception is to protect an exception created by HHS under pretense of delegated authority.
Pretty damn good example of violating the strict construction rule prohibiting extension by implication.
If there actually was some authority for The Court to intervene on behalf of capitalists against labor, then the proper course would be to strike down the HHS rules, rather than to legislate a de novo privilege and immunity out of those HHS rules which they then confer to for profit corporations.
An executive department agency can’t legislate but a court can?
But this is the sort of thing that happens when you have weak minded religious fanatics on The Court who are easily distracted and confused by their own religious bigotry that the law is lost to them.
In this regard, and under a light most favorable to this 5 man majority, I might extend the blame as a vicarious liability.
Two massive issues, that get almost as much Press as, the USA unwritten rule that all persons on earth must stand in unconditional support of anything Israel does or else face the
consequences of being spied on by the USA government under the assertion of suspected terrorism or whatever other popular pejorative is currently in vogue fall into the following
(I) Money in Politics - which was willfully and intentionally perpetualized by Congress
(II) Sexual morality - Heterosexual fucking as licensed by the State in which you reside or else dare to travel through, which is perpetuated as “the norm” by Congressional default
In terms of “(I)” The Liberals want to mutilate the 14th Amendment to deprive corporations of legal recognition as one person, so that they can proscribe or regulate the amount of money corporations give to political campaigns and regain an advantage with labor unions which are non corporate associations.
Both of these issues and practically all other USA domestic problems are attributable to one fact:
The Party (the USA Democratic-republicans) are candy asses for weak minded persons that continue on with their Holier Than Thou crusade, which is comprised of the following:
(A) There is something referred to as god whom some claim is the absolute sovereign of earth and that The Bible was written by “him” so it’s the absolute law above all other laws; and therefore anyone or anything that opposes the USA version of capitalism, which was surely invented and ordained by god “himself”, is evil, must be brought under control by the government or else destroyed; and that the only alternative now allowed is controlled discussion of some vanilla aspects of “socialism”, but only when they are hammered into conformity with the tenets of USA Liberalism and USA Conservatives get to call it godless Communism; and
(B) That private Heterosexual fucking, to make more people, and as licensed by the State, is ‘the norm’; but some lesser alternatives maybe tolerated under various governmentally controlled regulation such as birth control and same sex activities might be allowed as long as they are hammered into conformity with the Liberal precept that these poor wretched beings just can’t help being Queer and Conservatives get to say it’s their immoral choice.
For humanity, in general, this is as bad as the test for being a USA Presidential candidate - viz., you have to act like a Roman Catholic receiving “confirmation”, make a speech that mentions god and then vote for a war involving the mass murder of innocent people, along with the intentional infliction of emotional distress upon the survivors, along with an assortment of permanent mental disorders, facilitated by torture, all to facilitate a general colonialist repression, and all in the name of god, because it’s purportedly good for business.
To understand the reality of this, you 1st have to understand and thus accept the fact that the sole purpose of the USA under Party rule is
(i) to facilitate, encourage and protect the ruthless exploitation of humanity in order to
(ii) tax it and
(iii) to direct the proceeds of that tax into perfecting the facilitation, encouragement and protection of the ruthless exploitation of humanity.
The Personal God
These people like to have some pretense for doing the ruthless exploitation of humanity thing and it almost always devolves to the old standby, “god” e.g., we are a Christian nation and we do this in the name of “god”. The problem however is that not everyone sees it that way; and like any ruler or leader you require land and capital to work your exploitation of humanity from and there’s only two ways of getting it
(a) you take it and then
(b) you use diplomacy.
So one person or group of persons might get the god idea too and think well god is something outside of the universe or god exploded and is the universe or all sorts of permutations and combinations which are beyond human comprehension anyway; or for that matter people simply don’t think about it at all; but the god of American capitalism is necessarily within the paradigm of capitalism - e.g., communism is evil and is therefore in opposition to god so it cannot peacefully co-exist on the same planet. Some philosophers attribute these sorts of “ideas” to what they refer to as a “personal god”.
So in the case of the 5 man “Conservative” majority, it’s easy for them to accept the idea of god within the ruthless exploitation of humanity paradigm of capitalism. To them there is no apparent conflict. Whereas to others, as myself, we don’t accept it, so our beliefs can’t be in any manner religious? Or, in fact they must be contrary thereto? Hence we are the miscreants and are therefore excluded.
Not by god but by men and their “religious beliefs”
And yet, throughout the world it would appear that there isn’t just one god but actually a multitude of them; so that if you just take something in the name of your god, you’re not going to be able to keep it because eventually you will be overwhelmed by others unless you treat with them.
Now the following further exemplifies my points and resulted from this online onslaught waged against me by a Jew:
“This once ongoing and now exhausted argument resulted from _____________ not knowing the difference between Legitimacy - as ground in the Law of Nations for National Sovereignty and a “historical claim”; and from his lack of intellectual acumen ____ then proceded to assert that I’m a Muslim-Pedophile-Christian and other assorted mental bullshit gibberish which is part of his style:
By your own Holy Book, you have this guy Abram, who had a tribe of people from assorted places, some of whom were slaves along with various animals and the whole gang were all nomads - i.e., they had no land other than what they were able to possess, which they weren’t very successful at doing.
The guy(s) that wrote this story then claim that “The God of Israel” told Abram that if all of the men cut off their foreskin and fucked all of the women as often as possible then there will be so many people they will be difficult to overwhelm and then you can just squat somewhere and where you squat shall be known as Israel.
That way the guys with the naked dickheads would be distinguished from everyone else - e.g., look at my dick, fuck me, be a part of Israel !! and it was a clever plan. For example, in feudal arrangements, some guy kills a fuck load of people takes over their land and divides it up with his gang members. He becomes King and his gang members become Lords. But in the case of Abram, having no land, he instead promises the guys pussy. So all of these guys with naked dick heads go around fucking all of these women with the express purpose of making a fuck load of people.
But it wasn’t easy because when we get to Sodom and Gomorrah it turns out that all of the men were so Gay and so uninterested in fucking women that none of them even remembered how, except for Lot. Who wanted his daughters all to himself but had to get drunk so his daughters could fuck him because The God of Israel turned his wife into a pillar of salt?
Now what cop would ever believe that story?
So after hundreds of years going in and out of slavery this gang and/or their ancestors never secured this elusive place referred to as Israel but squatted at various places which were noted in your own Holy Book.
Those places serve as your only basis for your historical claim and after about 2000 years later which only became Internationally pertinent after Adolf Hitler decided to exterminate the greater number of you and the USA, the UK and the rest of the world said O Jesus Christ no we don’t want them here. So then the 1st world gang had Great Britain make a colony for Jews based on some of those aforesaid locations
With an obvious factor being that the Palestinians would be the least formidable in their objections
Here’s some of the people that agree with you http://youtu.be/vk9Zc4z6UBg
Clearly this “god told Abram” refers to Abram’s personal god.
But who in the USA would ever dare demand that this is not a bona fide “religious belief” of Jews?
This is what the 5 man majority so far demands trumps any US law regarding employer-employee relationships.
So we have this personal god of Abram who is something like Caspar the friendly ghost: flies in one ear hole make a few promises and then flies out the other which forms the basis of a “religious belief” even though an objective conclusion of fact, on the alleged facts so declared, is that Abram was a 99 year old inspired gang leader that wanted his own territory and marketed his idea to people already reliant upon him as “a voice” !! from the God of Israel !!
Veritably, the original “Godfather”.
Ironically, the god of Israel must also be the god of the USA, but doesn’t appear to be the god of too many other places. So does this make all of the rest of earth and all those other people evil?
It would appear that according to Jews, all the rest of the people are simply, not them. So is it fair to ask whether this legendary distinction serves as the basis for exclusion? Because if it is and you refuse to treat with ‘the others’ then that’s very likely the reason you were never able to hold on to Israel -viz., you were overwhelmed by others.
And yet, “the sexual norm” imposed upon the USA, by The Party, is what the tribe of Abram were instructed to do by Abram for the purpose of taking land by overwhelming it with people born from male circumcised Heterosexual fucking.
Is this why the USA has nuclear weapons and doesn’t want anyone else to have them unless it considers them their ally? Why be a candy ass? Ask them. Maybe the god of Israel is talking to Obama-Biden, legend had it “he” talked to Henry Cabot Lodge.
Heterosexuality is Not ‘the norm’, but the Pleasure of Attraction, is
Unless you want to overwhelm a territory with people, there really isn’t any imperative for imposing Heterosexual fucking as the norm and yet this is what The Party does. So it’s possible that the god of Israel became the god of The Party in order to overwhelm and Genocide the Native population under pretense of “religious belief” but why are they still pushing this?
The reason pleasure is subject to Dr. Moreau’s Party vivasection, from sex, and various naturally occuring substances is because in terms of sex, The Party interpretation is that sex is for making babies, because this is what Abram imposed on his tribe as he was purportedly instructed to do so by the god of Israel. There is absolutely no other explanation provided by anyone in The Party or in the private sector other than that; and then somewhere along the way this was modified to be, with one woman who is prohibited from sex with anyone else, which suggests some sort of ownership, mutual or otherwise.
But the fact is that sexual acts have to be learned and yet the pleasure of attraction, doesn’t. The latter is natural, the former is not
And it would be performing a great service to humanity if women would be open about this so that everyone could alas know if the same or similar attractions naturally occur to women as they do for men.
Comments are available on this blog via Disqus. Until then, I can only speak for myself:
The 1st truly amazing non have to go pee hard on I can remember having was going to this place where my cousin worked where the walls were literally covered with Playboy magazine foldouts. But I had no idea what to do with it. I didn’t know what masturbation was and didn’t know what fucking or blow jobs were either; but there it was, visual attraction = boing, instant raging throbbing pumping hardon, mushy heart and altered state of consciousness.
Now speaking of pleasure, alone, a blowjob or Heterosexual fucking usually beats masturbation; and for what ever reason, women don’t seem to be too keen on doing blowjobs and even when they do it’s usually for money, a favor or some other “valuable consideration” and even then most still don’t seem to know what they’re doing; but it works the other way too, most guys aren’t too keen about eating pussy, and even when they do, most don’t know what they’re doing, either.
Maybe that’s why Shrimp aren’t Kosher: they look like an uncircumcised cock and if you leave them around a while they start to smell like pussy.
So in regard to blow jobs and pussy eating, same sex is better. A guy has a cock, he plays with it regularly so he knows what makes it cum and if he wants to he can make another man cum too. The same is true for women and pussy.
Women don’t seem to like jizz either even though I don’t find anything wrong with it, I bet it’s the same for women and pussy?
So there you are: your guy won’t eat your pussy and your girl won’t suck your cock and it’s all because of Abram that suddenly became Abraham.
So the followers of Abram and his personal god impose shame to prevent men from cock sucking so that they will instead direct their jizz into a woman’s pussy in order to facilitate the “peopling of a territory to establish Israel” policy; but in present times, thousands of years later, Israel is already overpopulated and in terms of the utter lack of planning, waste and capitalism, so is the USA. So there is no reason to continue this policy of “jizz directing” based on the original Jewish godfather’s personal god story, with policy action thereon having been initiated thousands of years ago; but due to shame, Party imposition and Holier Than Thou ‘lazy habit’, Heterosexual fucking remains the irrational norm, imposed by shame.
Now inevitably some men and women will disagree and claim they like cock sucking and pussy eating via the opposite sex; but if you really think about it, what facilitates you cumming from opposite sex action is the degree of passion and devotion the other puts into the act and more often than not it concludes in Hetero fucking anyway because for whatever reason that ironically seems like the least fucked up thing for opposite sex people to do.
The irony is that same sex action is more like Holy Shit you really know how to do that !! and there are women that can learn this but it takes a lot of practice which is discouraged by the ruling Patriarchy - i.e., the woman is supposed to be a virgin that doesn’t know how to fuck and then the guy ends up going to sex workers who fuck several or more men a day.
The downside of Heterosexual fucking is that pregnancy sometimes occurs and because people have been shamed into it and shamed out of same sex due to thousands of year old gang land scheming, people use birth control, and if that fails, they get an abortion.
This seems like a rational alternative to “religious belief” and the veritable delusional neuroses that Liberal/conservatives emote in regard to sexual pleasure; but Heterosexual fucking whose main purpose is peopling territory to call it Israel or overwhelming native Americans and calling it a white Christian nation with the innovation of birth control and abortion by physician, is not a solution for anything and is a rather primitive and inconvenient way for humans to relate to and interact with each other - e.g., The Oedipus_complex and incest in general, maybe even pedophilia.
In any event, neither sex is keen on it - viz., guys want girls to give them blowjobs, but girls don’t want to; girls want guys to eat their pussy, but guys don’t want to. Face it, straight fucking just ain’t enough and yet they are still being guilted into it for no rational reason other than Abram’s delusion/bullshit and Congressional default.
In order to make any progress in this regard do we have to form our own tribe to stop accepting Heterosexual fucking as the norm and demand that government and the private sector do the same? We can even have a T-Shirt that says “Ut O Popey, Look Out: Here come the New Albigensians scroll down to origins, we now allow jerking off, mutual masturbation, oral sex and religious beliefs like clothes are optional
Everybody likes the idea of corruption because it allows someone to say, what the fuck is wrong with him? Who him? yeah. O he’s corrupt. The idea being that he/she was good once but something turned them bad. So in the case of The Garden of Eden, the idea is that Eve was corrupted and then corrupted Adam which pissed off god who booted the whole lot of them out, from whence comes this general idea that there was once upon a time some good state of anything or everything and that something or someone bad corrupted it. So aside from my view that everything is fucked up but allowing evolution to do it’s thing will allow it to get better, suppose it was like this:
All the guys laid around in their spare time doing 69 with each other, mutual masturbation &c and all of the women laid around in their spare time doing 69 with each other, mutual masturbation &c. But something or someone came by and told a guy to put his cock into someone’s pussy, or like in the case of Adam and Eve and the Patriarchal Jews it’s always the woman’s fault, hence vice versa, come on big boy put that cock in here, try this out for a while and then a baby was born. Holy shit !! but wow that’s really scary looking. Let’s go back to the same sex thing, but as there’s less of us through death, we’ll do the fuck thing, but only as needed. You know, democracy, but then came the King thing - thou shalt put your cock in her pussy and make lots of babies because it is the will of this greater force that will rip the flesh from your bones turn you into salt and shit like that if you refuse to comply, all in order to people a territory !! that’s the corruption, because it would be a dictator, by whatever means, leading people into doing something unnatural and for reasons that aren’t in their interest, you know like business and The Party does to labor in the USA.
The opposition and human cruelty recorded in the history of humanity serves as a preponderance of evidence to confirm my version or some variant thereof, over these “religious beliefs”.
So what this 5 man majority is essentially saying is either
(1) we’re too terrified of ourselves to allow our own personal ability of reason to go beyond our own “religious beliefs” or
(2) what we say goes, “religious beliefs” trumps reason and the will of the people.
The point is, there is no reason to create exceptions for employment by churches or other religious corporations or associations. Employment is employment and it exists inside the paradigm of capitalism not religion and therefore ought not to be treated any differently in terms of benefits, taxes or anything else. So that if Congress confers benefits on employees, by virtue of the fact that they are employees then those benefits are for them not their employer.
The people that can’t help themselves are not Homos they are Heterosexual fuckers and for those weak minded unjustifiably privileged assholes that can’t handle the fuck word, “breeders” are the ones making the rules. And of this ruling group there are religious fanatics that “believe” some Jewish junk written thousands of years ago is their instruction from god in re sex or else claim to believe it for electoral purposes - pander to it, perpetuates it - or in support of whatever other ulterior motives they have; and then there are people that just like to fuck.
The irony is that my solution solves the problem of the religious fanatics because it makes fucking, special. It’s something you have to think about like maybe there’s other ways of achieving sexual pleasure; but they don’t want people doing blow jobs, being naked on cam masturbating &c. Yeah? Well too fucking bad is what I say to them and what you ought to say too. Why the fuck do you even allow these people into government? They’re obviously lunatics. But what about the Heterosexuals that just like to fuck? Are they shit out of luck because they end up with more people that no one wants or needs except people that can’t afford to take care of them and then the kids grow up as psychologically damaged?
The Liberals, progressives or whatever they are or think they are, do not have a solution to this problem other than their panacea to life - i.e., bribe the private sector into doing shit they otherwise refuse to do - e.g., make insurance companies provide birth control for the people that can’t control themselves. My position in this regard is the same as it is for elections, if you’re going to use unwilling tax payers’ money to bribe the private sector into providing birth controls which ought to also include abortions - and Henry Hyde can go fuck himself who is now thankfully dead anyway - then just do it yourself - i.e.,
make all birth controls free
This should please conservatives because at worst it is governmental promotion of Heterosexual fucking.
Obviously, Heterosexuals can’t help themselves, they have to fuck the opposite sex and there are too many people. So for the sake of the general welfare provide them with free birth control !! It’s better than having “social programs” that pay poor people that can’t afford to have children, to have children, and then those children most likely end up psychologically damaged anyway regardless of how many dollars Liberals pour into such programs. These programs just don’t work in a capitalist world where all government is 100% reliant on the private sector which requires unemployment, poor people and a mass population of Proletariat veritably held by government while the private sector ruthlessly exploits them.
So you have 3 Liberal economy elites, 2 of which are guaranteed by The Party a high rank in the Liberal stratified society hierarchy based on property and income:
(1) Health care providers, which includes Hospitals, clinics, various doctor corporations, associations and partnerships and all of the various employees, maintenance and security staff; drug companies, drug retailers and retailers in general and all of the various employees, maintenance and security staff.
(2) Banks, newspapers, radio, television, campaign workers and all of the various employees, maintenance and security staff;
(3) Poor people that are shamed out of homosexuality that can’t help doing breeder fucking and can’t afford birth control.
All of these people except for the 3rd group can afford birth control albeit (like anything else) it’s grotesquely and ruthlessly overpriced.
Making it free to them is cheaper than all of these other programs that are designed and intended to augment price and guarantee profits for business.
Once it’s free and profitless it’s like this: hey, if you have babies and can’t afford to take care of them, we’re not either. So here’s the birth control. It’s free. Use it. It’s a matter of General Welfare.
The only thing that is preventing this from happening is this rot about Heterosexual fucking being the norm and promoting it as such. Heterosexual fucking is the problem !! Just stop doing it. And when the nut jobs start up tell them the truth. Quit knuckling under and submitting to their pseudo religious bullshit
The same is true with elections.
Heterosexuals that can’t help themselves that can afford to have kids, let them inherit the earth. They already know who they are going to vote for. The only people that don’t are the Proletariat, who are doing their indentured servitude to these aforesaid Heterosexuals that can afford to have children and in terms of elections they have no choice anyway because whoever is elected has zero impact on their life sentence to wage slavery with no time off for good behavior - maybe we’ll let you piss down the neck of you neighbor. So alas it’s the poor:
But they have no TV, radio and are too busy begging or stealing to peruse the news. But still, they, like the Proletariat, have no choice anyway
The only need for money in campaigns is to bribe category “(2)” above, except for banks because they merely hold the money for extended loan making for Liberal uses like inflating housing prices and providing money for workers to consume. They don’t need it because money is free to them anyway since the bailout. The targets here are newspapers, radio and television. And then you have to ask yourself, why aren’t these doing the JFK thing?
“Ask not what your country can do for you ask what you can do for your country”.
They probably would if The Party asked them, rather than paid for advertising to promote the contrary; but the fact is most of the “money in politics”, aside from being codified by Congress as the way campaigns are done, goes to campaign workers, lying to people about what The Party candidate will do for them if elected. And that is the only reason there is no “publicly financed campaigns” because nobody wants to pay for such unnecessary bullshit.
The way that is preserved and protected is by closed primaries and requiring petitions with so many names which are challenged anyway all before you are allowed to appear on any voting ticket. Those numbers can’t be achieved unless you pay people to go around and collect them for you and even then you have to have $$s to hire muscle to visually defeat The Party muscle - e.g., thugs to intimidate people to not sign your petition, sign someone else’s or here sign mine and if someone’s intimidating you we want to know who they are so we can kick their ass or buy them off. All of which has to be done in a limited period of time
The only person complaining here aside from me are Liberals but all they are willing to do is make laws that prevent republicans from collecting more money than they do so that Liberals may then e.g., buy appointments to commissions to ban motion pictures and television advertisements which they feel are contrary to their interests in getting elected. And to do this they want you to annihilate the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution to preclude corporations from giving people political contributions, which has now spilled over into birth control.
They are lost in the woods and lost from the law. It has nothing to do with any corporations except one, The USA Democratic-republican Party.
And has everything to do with a capitalist free market society and The Party that is 100% reliant on it - viz., everything is bought and sold for the highest price. Everything.
Even “religious beliefs”
It’s not because The Party was once pure and pristine and now they’re corrupt, it’s what they believe in and thus how they operate. It’s their way of life. Just ask yourself, why would you want to elect anyone from The Party that is so easily “corrupted” by money?
Or, so easily corrupted by, The Pope?