The Democratic-republicans still hold back. Come on just go with it. Nope they can’t do it and thereby hinder social evolution.
Being closer to death than birth and having followed these things for most of my time (and not by choice) it has been my observation and now an irresistible conclusion of fact that these persons lack self confidence regarding the reality of earth and earth people.
Now the importance of all this in regards to social evolution is that after water, food and shelter (which I include therewith, clothing) is sex, it’s the next thing, in “the progression of life”.
How can people not know this?
Because the ignorance is generally the product and intended result of censorship. You have to give us a chance to exude through “this fragile eggshell mind”, the material want of luxury; and yet the urge for sex, or what shall satiate this need, remains. Why is my cock doing this, why does my pussy feel this way?
The sort of “sex education” that teaches people the mechanics of fucking and procreation does not satiate this need, either. The obfuscation and censorship of sex precludes an otherwise free and natural result, which would make the most awesome sensations of life easy to peacefully and agreeably obtain.
Now wait a minute tommy, sex, like water, food and shelter is another one of those things we have to corner (monopolize) for profit.
So the “conservatives” have decided that the prime period for the indoctrination of human perversion - to supplant sexual ecstasy with the want of generally unnecessary material possessions and luxuries - is when sexual desire 1st blossoms in human beings; so that by the time you’re an adult you’re sexually repressed and have graduated into the D-r realm of forced conformity.
No one challenges this except me and maybe a few other people and most of those are most likely in a situation where they can buy anything anyway - e.g., earlier in the year Hugh Hefner noted that the “conservative” Presidential campaign is a war against sex and the media never mentioned it again.
So there is this natural desire and need for sexual ecstasy, which the D-r(s) forbid or else severely restrict - e.g., you have to have a license; you can’t have sex with someone under a certain age which is determined by Daddy’s in the Legislature who are afraid someone else is going to fuck their little girl; and other various assorted rules that if you break, the D-r(s) will personally guarantee that your life will be fucked up forever.
They will even put you in prison with members of your same sex who will rape and then kill you.
And there you have it, the succinct appellation for sexual ecstasy “fuck” is rendered pejorative punctuated with Homosexual rape and murder in prison and by “conservatives” that consider criminally obscene utterance of the word “fuck” on non cable TV or broadcast radio. As a direct and immediate result, success = sexual repression or at the very least “respectability is under the covers”, which Lenny Bruce was talking about 50 years ago and which the D-r(s) are presently doing every conceivable thing in and out of their power to preserve and protect forever and ever until ages and ages. It is remarkable they’ve yet to “erect” a monument, altar or tabernacle to these ultimates in human perversion and the hatred of God/nature.
Everytime society is on the verge of Liberation, here comes the D-r good cop bad cop to serve this up as the “bi-partisan” Great Compromise centerpiece of some national election or allowance for food stamps; until it persists for so long no one knows why, they merely obey and conform their life to this and other perversions.
There is a simple solution to this, it’s “lifestyle neutral politicking”, like gender neutral - e.g., we use “person” instead of “him” or the patronizing “her” in reference to rights. There are other people that vote that aren’t Heterosexually or Homosexually “married”. There is no real necessity in adhering to this “conservative” Party - “Moynihan Report” standard for human existence - i.e., the white man works for money to buy pussy and care for it, husbands the progeny to “raise” responsible consumers by indentured servitude; and as the report urges that government must compel the Black man to conform to this white man role. That’s all it is.
But this has gone on for so long without opposition except to some modest degree by the Gay “community” for the purpose of Gay marriage, that it’s become confused and confounded with religion, the Liberal Bourgeoisie consumption society in servitude to business, &c &c.
And it is from this remarkable diffidence that they adhere to the legendary “conservative” tradition to move “with all deliberate speed”, or like my mother used to say, “like molasses in January” - e.g., the US Senate, presently owned by Mitch McConnell and the State of Kentucky.
So you have to Love the present in order to re-elect McConnell so why not President Obama?
So what arguments do they proffer? None, they don’t have to, no one challenges it.
But the Greatest of these Perversions is clearly the deprivation of water, food and shelter, for profit. The sole reason this persists is because the D-r(s) forbid US to use our own government for ourselves and instead leave us with no alternative than to sacrifice our brief mortal existence to private business or else fucking die right here and now; and this is our sole means for acquiring, sustenance - viz., directly from the private sector subsistence monopoly.
Now if you’re in NYC collecting money hand over fist, tipping everyone for everything then the act becomes as automatic as masturbation. Which is more natural? And then again, in the case of tipping all you have to think about is the size of the tip, which also becomes automatic.
More people that decide elections know this than don’t.
It’s fair to conclude then, that if you are at that point, that you take water, food and shelter for granted. It’s not a problem, it just comes and goes where and when needed. You need a drink or a glop of food matter you hand over the money and there it is. Swallow here, poop there.
And it may be effectively argued that capitalism has made this ability and availability possible in what has evolved into an impossible situation - e.g., how many people do you know that have a big enough yard to raise cattle - and yet scoff it down every day; or live near the ocean or live on vegetables alone; and yet, for all of the remaining years of your life, you yourself most likely will never arise to that next social stratum, where you to have enough extra money - i.e., “disposable income” to buy sex, whenever or however you want it.
The upper Middle class and the 1% can and do, so they have one set of rules and you have yours - you settle for a sex partner for life and still want Free Love but society makes you feel guilty for that if not outright punishing you. This is sexual repression, it’s only a matter of degree.
Paradoxically, this ability and disability is one of the greatest of all class tensions. Sex sells, and yet it is something which is never directly discussed by Marxist or Marxist persons and as a result of this we have “the sex industry” which is in direct conflict with Free Love. The “logic” is remarkably straight forward - if we deprive human beings of water, food and shelter, for profit, then surely we’ll do the same regarding sex. Sex is not only less important, but of no importance at all - just another thing the ruling class take for granted.
To the best of my knowledge there is no government program that allows you to stand in line for sex, even though the Doms at the welfare and employment offices, let alone the courts of law, for those of US that can’t afford to lease a lawyer, create a somewhat opposite impression.
So alas, conserve, conform and concede, sex is something that you have to buy. Who aside from myself could ever have the audacity especially in the USA to argue otherwise. Christ tommy we charge you for a bottle of water and you think “we’re” going to let you have sex for free?
It all depends on who you want to have it with and how they feel about you. Are they willing? Or only for money, are they holding out for more or just conform and consider the whole thing unimportant; and maybe if we can get away from emulating animals - O let’s do it doggie style; are there Homosexual animals? Bisexual ones? Why is this important? Because male animals essentially rape female ones and this justifies men acting like animals? Or women acting like forestallers? But who knows because we never discuss these things with any sort of depth.
John Lennon brought up a good point in his last interview regarding the critic driven society or at least a critic driven business - he said that people want dead heros, because death freezes them in time, and thus the iconic image persons manufacture and imbue to that creation is forever.
So let me ask you, once you know that this dead guy is the one that is really ruling your sex life and sexual reality wouldnt you rather rule yourself and help others do likewise