The common denominator of “conservative” “thought” (if such thing were even possible) is that the sole incentive to human existence is money and the acquisition thereof. Business being their chosen means for acquiring it. So rather than doing anything uselful where money might serve some means to accomplish this useful end or utility, they’re simply in business to acquire money.

It’s the essence of their ideas regarding taxation.

Business to acquire money is their “God Given” right to “pursue happiness” but the Satanic Communistic forces of any that “dare to defy” ruin all their fun by forcing them to pay labor: so that labor can buy the very products “it” made; or to pay taxes so that government can satiate the thirst of Exxon Mobil to sell oil so that it may thence be spread all over the globe to drive automobiles over and trucks to deliver business products.

So apparently if no one paid them to drink and eat they would simply perish; and thus money rather than sustenance is their main object for self preservation. Defense is merely a means to protect it. Fritz Lang expresses this brilliantly in “Woman in the Moon”.

And this being their unmovable pacoderm like disposition, all of their government dependent policies concern ways in which government can be used to serve them and further their ends and if they refuse then they’re the 47%

So in my last blog entry I persuaded you to concede that Mittney, McConnell and Ryan are psychopaths; but that psychopathy is not biological, nor moreso than Homosexuality; and that Heterosexuality, like money itself, is just another creation of society; perhaps by mutation or perhaps intended, nonetheless it is something that results therefrom.

To serve or not to serve, that is the question; but do we have any choice? If you believe in what they describe as God, then no; your destiny is to serve and honor them; if however you believe in free will then you see them for what they are and render their megalomania, inconsequential.

So a great deal of hot air is expent by conservatives convincing US that there has to be a solution to moochery and non-business persons’ dependency on government, which is essentially Calvinism - viz., everyone must serve business, which like Calvinism becomes confused and confounded with “God”; and that those of you bound and afflicted by this “conservative party malady” accept their gambit enter their field from below and hip deep in filth make yourself comfortable or else prepare for your uphill battle. I decline.

Because I am a lazy good for nothing commie miscreant, I’m free to propose a reasonable alternative and so penultimately ask - what is the solution to society’s creation of psychopathy?

And it’s really quite simple - all We have to do is act on behalf of the people, generally, through Our Federal Constitution, and thus to provide for the General Welfare. To facilitate such fresh clean start we have to abolish in mind, spirit and law all remnants and vestiges of business privilege.

Money is not a necessity for human existence, it is clean water, healthy earth from whence all food is provided; a means to safely dispose of our shit, piss and other garbage, shelter to be safe in sleep, fuel for warmth and cooking and some means by which we may safely travel around, socialize and acquire the things we need for our subsistence. In this regard money is at best a means representing a value for something that exists elsewhere and that value comes into our hands so that we may acquire that thing it represents or some other fungible thing; and as shown in previous entries, the more self sufficient a community or nation is the less money is needed. Compare the unchallenged Mittney, McConnell, Ryan assertion that laws are divinely inspired or handed down by ancient lawgivers - e,g. “our Judao Christian heritage”. The following is quoted from Lawbrain.com

“The Spirit of the Laws was published in 1748 in Geneva. It was a huge and immediate success; by the end of 1749, twenty-two other editions, including many translations, had reached all over Europe and across the ocean to the North American colonies. The work also generated considerable controversy, particularly with church authorities. They objected to Montesquieu’s intellectual approach, which was grounded in the then radical notion that laws were not divinely inspired or handed down by ancient lawgivers such as Moses but evolved naturally out of everything that influences life in a country, including traditions, habits, history, religion, economics, and climate. Laws, Montesquieu believed, could be rationally studied and then adjusted to increase liberty for all. He responded to criticisms of his work in 1750 with Defense de l’Esprit des lois, but the Catholic Church nevertheless put The Spirit of the Laws on the church’s Index in 1751, which meant that Catholics were forbidden to read it. Despite this official censure, Montesquieu was named director of the Academie Française in 1753”.

So much for Mittney, McConnell & Ryan’s Divine Inspiration assertions, which Democratics regrettably never challenge or question, which plays nicely for Mittney’s McSidekicks.

“After the Revolutionary War ended, Montesquieu again became a principal authority as political leaders set about to create a constitution for the new United States of America. Most of the architects of the Constitution were thoroughly acquainted with Montesquieu’s ideas, and at the Constitutional Convention of 1787, The Spirit of the Laws was frequently cited as delegates attempted to lay down the principles for a government that would maximize political liberty while also maintaining the rule of law. The Framers followed many of Montesquieu’s maxims, including his insistence upon a separation of powers and his belief that a country’s laws must not be imposed from above but conform to the genius, or nature, of the citizens of that country”.

The irresistible conclusion is that these peculiar and contrary ideas of Mittney, McConnell and Ryan marketed and sold to you by their psychopathy is the problem, not Our government which they want to wrest control of in order to use for their own ends. It is a coup d’etat under their psychopathic pretense of “democratic” elections.

So now you know how a “banana republic” feels. Karma works in strange ways.