October 4, 2012
Extra !! The Presidential Debate: October 3, 2012


What you saw last night was the world of the White Heterosexual Patriarchal Male and The Moynihan Report version of a Black Man, conformed, thereto - viz., the Nigger doing the work of the White Man and the White Man taking all the credit.

I “dropped out” of that paradigm before I was a teenager and please take comfort in the fact, sisters and brothers, there are others like you; but I also know what it’s like to have to play that game: short of paying in Cold Cash, it was the only way I could have ever experienced a Heterosexual piece of ass.

Jenna Tweet


That’s the trap butt ass like that is overated; it was never and never shall be my “pursuit of happiness”

The only exceptional thing, about the United States of America, is that this present society arose from an exceptional cruelty and barbarity. The history of this area was settled by a trapper that wrote in his journal that he nearly froze to death had he not run down and killed two savages to warm himself with their blood. The legacy of the White Man’s history in regard to this land is not only the genocide of the indigenous people, slavery, the chattel ownership and depredation of women, the wasteful depletion of resources, pollution, the extinction of various wildlife and fauna, but also religious persecution and cruel and unusual punishments.

The idea that human beings were born into such nightmare, fought for a better life, and yet died in vain, is in itself an intolerable testament to the abject failure of these “citizens”; but now to continue on in this same tradition, although rightfully and honestly under the appropriate appellation “conservative”, compounds the abomination.

It was why I was subject to endless reruns of Adolf Hitler on “The Twentieth Century” every Sunday night, wondering if Slim Pickens was riding a nuclear bomb down into WWIII, so surely there must be some greater cruelty, why just look here.

In this day and age, none of this is necessary; it’s the wrong path, in the wrong paradigm, yet the Democratic faction of Thomas Jefferson’s Democratic-republican party, in the year 2012, decides to glorify in it; and expends their contributions in political campaign/neo-Bible Meetings, by and with the same mob psychology that sold little hanging dolls at public lynchings.

Aside from creating the willful and intentional impression that there is nothing else, no alternative, and thus serving no other end than the depredation of all persons into the world of the White Heterosexual Patriarchal Male it likewise attests to how stupid these politicians think people are. And if they elect Mittney, McConnell and Ryan then it either proves beyond any reasonable doubt that they are indeed that stupid or that the Democratic-republicans want them to be, or want US to believe, they are, because afterall, whom would it seem has the better prospective?

~*~*~*~*~*~*~

This is the gist of what Mittney’s debate points were/are - e.g., about 10 mins worth at best

(1) Block Grants - which is essentially the heart soul and flesh of Mittney’s domestic policy (a) spending cuts (i) health insurance and (ii) education - e.g., “turn it over to the States” is code for “block grants”.

So after all discretionary spending is abolished (as much as Congress allows), war spending is increased for “a military second to none” and a flat tax or some variation thereof is adopted (or as much as Congress allows) then any surplus revenue for previous Federal programs, dealing with (so far) health insurance and education shall be “turned over to the States” to do what thou wilt with.

So Block grants were the heart soul and flesh of any point Mittney discussed except in his opposition to Dodd-Frank where he said that he was opposed to allowing people to commence banking enterprises from their garage; but in fact he would allow them to do the same from an already established bank, the only distinction being, the facade.

For back ground on States use of Federal funds see the US Supreme Court Case “Blum v Yaretsky” wherein Rehnquist elucidates his Policy that whenever Federal money goes to a State they are free to do whatever they want with it because under the Courts policy of so called “sovereign immunity” created by the 11th Amendment, rather than as ignorantly claimed by Mittney, the 10th: no person injuriously damaged, victimized and thus meeting the injury in fact doctrine may sue any State nor any one of them, in Federal Court, for any retroactive relief (see Edelman v. Jordan - 415 U.S. 651 (1974) cf., 11th A. Practice. Consequently when the various Great Society programs were commenced with Mandates on the States many States said “fuck you” and used the money to balance their budgets and when the persons injured in fact attempted to sue, the Federal Courts said “fuck you too”. And this is precisely what the 11th Amendment and these precedents thereunder would “allow” the State to do under Mittney’s policies. It’s boiler plate GOPstapo. Biden ought to know about this but would be wise to review it before his “debate” with the ruthless and cold blooded Paul Ryan.

(2) Taxation and Deregulation - most of this, aside from deregulation, is indeed vague and amorphous but he has avowed to not raise taxes based on his assertion that the top 3% of small businesses (in terms of annual income) employ 50% of all persons employed by small business, which he further asserts constitues 25% of all tax revenue; and that each 5% increase in taxes on this group collecting $250k or more annual income will result in the loss of 750k jobs; and by Mittney’s further assertion, his $5trillion tax cut is “revenue neutral” because he asserts that this tax cut, combined with deregulation and the opening of Our public lands to oil drilling, &c will allow the Federal government to ‘grow it’s way out’ of his $5trillion tax cut. Mittney also denies that there is any tax deduction to business for moving operations overseas.

(3) Privatization - in re “Obamacare” here Mittney admits (i) that the much touted $716 billion of alleged “cuts” by President Obama to Medicare, is actually a reduction of subsidies to hospitals rather than to beneficiaries but then further asserts that hospitals will pass this loss of Federal subsidies onto consumers and (ii) he further claims that this will result in a $2500.00 increase to taxpayers because leaving it to the private sector will be cheaper because whatever it is that the private sector does it’s always better than the government doing it - code for privatization.

(4) Miscellaneous - that President Obama is a nice man but is an abysmal and abject failure as US President, which is solely based on Mittney’s assertions that when President Obama took office there were 32 million people on food stamps and now there are 47 million and 23 million people are unemployed; and that if you elect Mittney then his Block grants, tax cuts, deregulation and privatization will create 12 million new jobs and “help the middle class”.

  1. blazintommyd posted this
Blog comments powered by Disqus