I might need to go into training but I want!!
Thanking the troops, supporting them, honoring them, &c is accepting the perpetuation of war making and the incorporation thereof into the USA social ethos.
Soldiers are like fucking Policemen. I wonder if President Christie will just drop all pretense and have them walking around armed and in Camo.
That whole trip was commenced under Carter/RayGun and carried over without interruption into O’Bama and has now assumed the logical status of appeal to pity: comply or be shamed, something like sex is for Breeding and the unconditional support for Israel.
Every Nation does needs a military in order to preserve and protect it’s Legitimacy and that’s where it ought to end and limit ought to be enforced by the United Nations, without exception - i.e., it ought to apply to the USA the same as to anyone else.
Ist we were led out of Neutrality and into Internationalism; and in regards to International war, it was supposed to end through the United Nations Organization, as declared in the Atlantic Charter, so that Nations could deal with
So what do I mean by “Human Issues”?
Clean water, good food and adequate shelter.
The Democratic-republicans - i.e., the Liberals and the “Conservatives”, either take these things for granted or else say, fuck it, we got ours and we don’t have time to worry about anyone else; and if the consequences of that results in a problem and that problem takes form in the expression of rioting or peaceful protest, then we just just borrow more money and hire more soldiers, Police, Intelligence and Security, because we have world war to do !! and that’s far more important than ‘the anyone elses’, which most likely includes you. Or they have some other priority which has nothing to do with you or me, like putting a man on the moon or how small can we see.
And that’s USA Democratic-republicanism in a nutshell. Keep voting for them and that’s all you get. Their defense for themselves is, everyone can’t be a winner, so those with a problem lost. If there’s some extra money give it to business and let it trickle down to them and awww that’s a shame when it doesn’t -
Ok “back to work” we have world war to do.
Until the basic human needs of all US citizens are provided for, the government “for the people” is an absolute farce. Face it, this is not a government for the people, it is a government for The Democratic-republicans to preserve and protect their stuff - viz., their property and status and for business: private sector world imperialism and the military/police protection thereof.
Consequently human issues are utterly ignored
Unless they are appealed to as some means to aid and protect some sort of failed USA style business - e.g., we can’t satiate our want of greed locally or nationally we need the whole fucking world and outer space. Comply or we overthrow your government and if we can’t, then we kill you. If you try to take action to defend against us, then that is best evidence that you deserve to die.
What this amounts to is, “The American Ideal” - viz., we as “americans” don’t have to be concerned with the unavoidable consequences of being human.
The ultimate perversity of this “American Chauvinism” and megalomania is that we shouldn’t be required to build or buy a majority in order to halt the Democratic-republicans and reclaim Our government for ourselves. In the less abstract, we shouldn’t have to build or buy a majority to make the Liberals stop doing war and supply clean water, good food and adequate shelter to the populace; instead of worrying 1st and foremost about keeping the Koch Bros and Monsanto happy and merely using Koch bros/Monsanto shit food as a pretense of doing something for people..
That’s the same “trickle down economics” of RayGun now administered by O’Bama.
In fact, the whole Democracy thing in regard to clean water, good food and adequate shelter is absolute bullshit. It shouldn’t be an issue. No one wants to be left with ignorant or incompetent people making decisions for them, particularly in regards to human subsistence; nor do they want people representing them that place business before their own human subsistence needs. So the Democratic-republicans con them and lie to them; trying to convince a majority that’s they’re a part of “it”; and then when someone exposes the truth, the Democratic-republicans hunt them down and kill them or place them in prison away from society until they’re dead or until all the Liberals and Conservatives that put them there are dead
Clean water and good food is far more important than health care. But health care is placed as the ultimate priority next to perpetual war; and cutting taxes for persons with the greatest income and capital, because it’s all about business and the ruthless exploitation of humanity. What that means is, their freedom, not yours, you are their chattel, their lab rats, you are human garbage.
Breed so they can put you through their meat grinders.
This is what happens in war, especially wars that do not provide, in any manner, to or for the general citizenry.
So these things - clean water, good food and adequate shelter - should Not even Be an issue. There should be no controversy regarding them, at all, and the only reason there is, is solely attributable to the irresistible and incontrovertible fact that the USA version of Democratic-republicanism is 100% reliant on the ruthless exploitation of humanity.
US Foreign Policy under Liberal Internationalism
So lately all of the Mc(s) [7% of the population controlling 95% of government offices] are glorifying in their annual celebration of the 3 year Presidency of the 1st Roman Catholic US President, whom his brother’s son via “Rolling Stone” magazine reported as saying [paraphrase] that USA foreign policy is a reflection of the American people.
The US international war policy is to attack a nation and divide it in half. And then the CIA hires people to do whatever it has to in order to people the government of one side of the divided nation, with officers friendly to the “interests” of the USA - viz., USA businesses and USA military bases to protect them, USA private sector access to resources, ports and shipping/trade routes to and fro’.
In re Israel
As far as US dopes like me, in the USA are allowed to know, the USA sort of did this in regard to dividing Jerusalem even though nothing of US business interest is there; and they probably did it in regards to guys like Netanyahu and other Conservatives; or else they did it with the Palestinians in order to perpetuate “the conflict”: but aside from the West Bank and Golan Heights, Israel is about the same as it was when the UK created it and declared it as a colony except there’s a lot more people, it’s overcrowded and polluted.
Paradoxically, the Citizens of Israel, need “living space”.
Zionism originated in Germany in the latter part of the 19th Century. The idea behind it, commensurate with the rest of earth is known in International Law as a “Historical Claim” in this case to territory in the Middle East, which, ironically, is/was the basis of various territorial claims made by the 3rd Reich in Europe.
They needed “living space” too, or so they claimed
Personally, I think historical claims are absolute bullshit, or at best are necessarily and properly ancillary to the only real basis for any territorial claim or for that matter any claims regarding anything, which is known in International Law as, “Legitimacy”, which means either one of two things in regard to Israel:
(1) The infant State of Israel had to independently secure the territorial claim, defend it and be recognized along with it’s claim by other recognized nations; or
(2) The UK claiming it as a colony had to do this on behalf of Israel so that the territory could be recognized as an Independent nation via the United Nations, according to the procedure set forth in the UN Charter in regard to colonies
This was done through the UN colonial process set forth in the UN Charter; and even though Israel (like the Vatican City) does not resemble anything which the ‘historical’ Law of Nations would consider as a nation; but under the positive law of nations - i.e., the UN Charter, it is; and apparently there is no issue regarding Israel’s legitimacy - i.e., it has the ability to defend it’s territorial claim.
Of Legitimacy and Prescriptive Right
In regard to legitimacy commensurate with the positive law of nations, there was also a “prescriptive right” which if memory serves correctly is 70 years; and the way that worked was this:
If I have a war and you lose and I gain from it territory which I possess, occupy and defend continuously for a period of 70 years, thereafter, then it’s mine. The downside of this is that if no other nation has the power to challenge it, then it continues, by default, just like anything else under Legitimacy. And sure enough, such an issue has indeed arisen since Israel’s Legitimacy was challenged and affirmed:
So now what happens to the territory Israel has occupied since the war in the late 1960s?
I personally do not see that there is any issue in regard to the UN Charter in regards to the recognition of a Nation and given the various prohibitions in regard to colonization and territorial aggrandizement any occupied territory has to be subject to the same requirements as the claimant - e.g., courts to administer fair justice, elections, government services &c to those people residing in the territories at issue; and in this regard, I am ignorant of what the State of such conditions are because such things simply aren’t reported in the USA.
So to me, the Deep Issue is this.
At what point in time shall the Independent Nation of Israel be subject to the same laws that - e.g., Iraq was held to by the USA in regard to Kuwait? And by immediate inference, where does the UN Charter create any exception, to the prohibition of “territorial aggrandizement”? To my mind there is none, except the one that has always existed in regard to Legitimacy - i.e.,
The failure of other recognized nations to denounce the claim; or demand means for these people to vindicate their basic human rights and entitlement to services in regard to clean water, good food and adequate shelter.
Intuition tells me such things do not exist. But what can you expect from e.g., the USA, which denies these very same means and services to the general citizenry only reserving them for a privileged few that can afford to buy a position in the socio-economic hierarchy whereby those that administer said services and access thereto consider the petitioner entitled thereto.
In terms of Legitimacy, a solution to the territorial issue is simple - i.e., to whom do these territories belong?
Territories and People are not one in the same
And this is one of the problems that results from historical claims, because the basis is always ethnic, cultural or religious and by immediate inference exclusion results in regards to people
There is a difference between National self determination and self determination of peoples, albeit neither are perfect, and both are vague at best
But if I can live a pleasant and agreeable life without others suffering, I don’t really care who my government is. Especially if subsistence is provided for and not rendered into a political issue under pretense of electoral “democracy”; but if someone comes to my house and says, get out, we have our own to live here, there is nothing fair or just about that situation regardless of whether it is voted for as the self determination of people or the self determination of a nation; because it is not a matter of territory, it is one of human rights.
Now, I consider myself a fairly intelligent person, but as far as I know and as incredible as this may seem: apparently, individuals have occupied these lands independent of any government? And if that’s true then it’s unincorporated individuals, whom nonetheless are entitled to the vindication of their human rights, against the full coercive force of a Sovereign Nation.
Kind of like David vs Goliath
The problem in that regard is that there is no Legitimate power to protect them, or moreover, no Legitimate Power and Authority willing, to protect them; while at the same time, those claiming to own their property or claiming a right to take it are not recognizing their human rights and are not providing free and “adequate” access to due process, whereby these rights may be vindicated. Where is just compensation for taking? Where is the forum in which this may be fairly and openly determined?
The UN is not simply about territory it is also about human rights.
Otherwise, the various “nations” that commenced an offensive war, testing the Legitimacy of Israel, and lost, ought to be responsible to and for these people, at least in terms of reparations; but it does not appear to me that any of them are claiming that these territories are theirs or that they owe these people anything?
So this is what I read and hear.
Zionism is Racism
Some Palestinians and others say that Zionism is Racism. I could presume that they say this because the initial historical claim by the Zionist Movement for the creation of Israel itself had the same basis/ground as those made by Adolf Hitler in regard to Europe; and Hitler and his Nazis certainly occupied those claims; but the key here is this:
Those claims were not recognized by other recognized nations; and this resulted in a war, which eventually resulted in the creation of Israel; but instead of a purported race the basis for the Israel claim was exclusion by religion, marriage and number - i.e, The Old Testament.
Like the origins of John Wesley?
This is a rather amazing situation when you actually take the time to think about it and analyze it. Are there any other nations created as such? All I can think of is The Vatican City, which is way smaller than Israel. There are a lot of Mormons in Utah but is it actually a “Mormon” State?
Anyway, this Zionism is racism claim seems to piss off “the kinda Jews the real Americans kin lurn ta like”, even though Native Americans have been systematically wiped out, Blacks are treated with a double standard, so are Jews and most any minority and if someone says that USA Democratic-republicanism is racist I don’t give a shit because it is.
But Zionism is no longer an issue in regard to the Legitimacy of Israel. Just like it isn’t in regards to Utah or in regards to the Vatican City. But exclusion obviously is.
There is also the double standard with USA Liberals, regarding the unconditional ‘cover Israel’s ass no matter what’ it does, while at the very same time denouncing other religious based domestic movements that also carry a Bible and make their claims on the sole basis of quotations taken therefrom. Just one more reason to drop all of this appeal to pity business in regard to Zionism and deal with the matter according to the law of nations and Human Rights
So to me it’s a matter of time - e.g., Israel is waiting for 70 years to claim a prescriptive right, which does nothing to solve any of the Human Issues of the people in these territories. And also time in conjunction with, the USA Liberal penchant for continuing something via 4th pillar proclamation that this is ‘eminently Liberal’ and then continuing it forever and ever - e.g, something Franklin Roosevelt said, or further legends regarding JFK and his 3 year Presidency. Again another reason to drop the historical claim business and all of the obsolete bullshit that goes with it.
Religion in General
Now between 70 and 80 years ago, the Nazis rounded up and killed a fuck load of Jews. There is no doubt about it and I by no means deny that it happened nor the numbers claimed; and this is indeed a terrible thing. So being that this is a terrible thing we are told or led to believe, correctly or incorrectly that this gave cause for the Brits to take up with the Zionists and impose upon the people in these territories a special colony for a religion - i.e., Judaism, which the UN has recognized as the independent nation of Israel. Like it or not, true or not, there it is.
Religion distinguished from Culture
But there are two factors involved in the creation of Israel that ought to be separated:
(1) Judaism, as a religion, is not the reason Adolf Hitler excluded Jews and perpetrated genocide against them. It was cultural. Judaism, via exclusion, by custom and practice, resulted in a separate and independent culture.
(2) We in the USA have been programmed to not view this as cultural, but to view it in terms of religion - e.g., “our Judao-Christian heritage”; while at the same, we are expected to honor a religious double standard, placing Jews in a preferred position, but only in regards to Israel. And what it amounts to, is this, if you’re a Jew, you’re not a real American, but pay for protection and we’ll give unconditional support to Israel, on your behalf.
Not unlike what Uncle Adolf was saying and not unlike James Madison’s send the Niggers back to Africa where they belong - viz., create Israel so we can send the Jews back to Israel where they belong. It’s all the same mentality. Like OMG what would we have done with all of them if we had actually stopped Adolf and IBM from exterminating them. It’s as if the UK and especially the USA said, ok Jews, after Uncle Adolf, we’re giving the rest of you another chance just like we did with our Niggers, try to be more like white people, keep your religion to yourself; which was the initial overt position of Hitler - e.g., be good Germans, don’t be Jews.
Aside from the questions regarding the human rights of the people inside these occupied territories I personally have several problems with this:
(1) We in the USA are expected to continue on in this appeal to pity, long after the Nation of Israel has already been established, it’s Legitimacy proven, affirmed and regardless of what it does.
(2) I don’t give a shit what anyone’s religion is, as long as it isn’t imposed on me. And it is absolutely obvious, that of any religion in the USA, the imposition of Judaism on USA society is absolute zero.
But Roman Catholicism is incessantly shoved down our throats by the Mc(s) e.g., with their MSNBC Adoration of the Pope, regardless of his anti-abortion influence on US citizens who lay prostrate before him kiss his feet his ring his whatever rather than expressing simple loyalty in respect to their own fellow citizens exercising their National Rights; Saint Patrick’s Day? Xmas, erm Christ’s Birthday? Or these various religious political factions with their anti abortion, anti sex anti nudity anti whatever.
Paradoxically we’re supposed to just standby and accept all of that. O and tommy don’t forget, unconditional support for Israel, it’s a duty of our Judao-Christian heritage.
I just don’t accept it. The ploy has outlived it’s time. Israel is not a US colony, it is an independent sovereign nation that is subject to the same rules and laws as any other nation and it’s time the USA formally accept that and start acting accordingly.
But again, don’t expect too much, even if they try, they’re Democratic-republicans: incompetent, inept, failures; and you keep choosing them as your rulers and masters. I guess US foreign policy really is a reflection of the American people and my exclusion is absolutely justified? Is this where I thank O’Bama?
Is, the annihilation of gender
Under Monarchy, the Lord in the King James Bible, is,
Under Democratic-republicans, the Lord becomes,
The Man of the House
The man’s home is his castle.
The D-r hierarchy runs from Slave owner, chairman of the board, God, Jesus, The Pope, Priests, US Presidents, Rabbis, the Petite Bourgeoisie and from there all the way down to Proletariat “Bread winner”.
Under the RayGun/O’Bama Democrat/Libertarians,
The Lord is business.
And we all know from our prayers that our survival and subsistence is at the absolute mercy of, the Lord.
Let US now pray to the Lord, “Give us this day our daily bread”
Under the Democratic-republican paradigm, USA citizens have been placed at the complete and total mercy of private business.
The incompetency of the Democratic-republicans is even more apparent in the self awareness of their own failure, which takes form in the number of weapons, they have, how large and extensive their military forces are, all of which they have entered into inextricable debt in order to maintain in the squandering of limited resources; and then there’s their internal domestic security: magnetometers, show me your papers, all of which is facilitated and enforced by the FBI, the various National Guard units, State Police, County Sheriffs all the way down to local Police officers; and somehow, within all of this security, men and their castle, have lost their place in the Democratic-republican hierarchy, to business and are, consequently, losing respect, from “their” women.
It’s because of the Liberals insistence that all of these things remain issues for the purposes of their phony elections. The result of that is that there are no longer any general human issues, because the Democratic-republicans require that any prospective issue take the form of
The binomial proposition.
Even the D-r(s) recognize the hypocrisy of reducing citizens to the subjects of private business, but they don’t allow any of the hierarchy to speak of it in terms of business, only in terms of corporations. That way it’s preserved as a perpetual issue: Corporations vs. small local shops. David vs. Goliath. The Big guy vs the Little guy. And alas, the classic, it’s good guy vs the bad guys. And the good guy is always outnumbered by the bad guys so we have to convince you to be a good guy too - viz., go along with “us”.
The key to cracking this paradigm is set forth in part one of this series quoted below - viz.,
“because people want to cum and enjoy the sexual and erotic nature of human life without having to enter into indentured servitude in order to do so”.
This, is the ultimate issue of issues. Free sex, as opposed to Free Breeding. It’s the same as the neo-moral defense against it, who’s gonna pay for the baby, which is changing the subject from sex to breeding. It’s all about breeding centric programming. The weak points of this defense starts with c2c masturbation. No one gets pregnant, no one gets venereal disease, in fact no one has to even know anything about you. The defense against this? O for shame, this is not breeding, this is not natural, it’s perverse. You don’t have to be subject to this - says the Holier Than Thou Liberal support network, paid for by business; and this is the only reason there is no free c2c masturbation unless it’s same sex.
Wait a minute tommy did I miss a premise; by enthymeme?
Breeding-centricity is the only reason women (can) make you pay for c2c masturbation.
People ought to be doing this for free because it’s fun.
Well I might with my boy friend (interject Liberal Holier than Thou neo-moral imposition) I already saw his portfolio plus he Did eat the Vomlet, so I feel secure. Just to masturbate? Liberal eavesdropper on line … you don’t have to subject yourself to this !! Pervert pervert (quick, blow your police whistle) ban him, ban him !! cyber rape, cyber rape !!
This leaves me nearly convinced that the following is axiomatic: women do not need men so if they absolutely have to have anything to do with men then got dam it, the man’s going to pay, one way or the other. Hence, breeding-centricity in a business based society:
I own you, but I take good care of my slaves. Submissive female slave ISO a new Master …
The other aspect of it is licensed sex - i.e., marriage. She ran off with a real estate salesman !! OMG, Madge, the used car salesman, really?
Couldn’t you just fuck him in the back seat or at the motel?
Jesus Christ who the fuck is going to wash my poopy undies !! O well I guess she’d rather wash his. Or why couldn’t they just c2c online?
O, a Wall Street Lawyer? Wow, I’m speechless I don’t know what to say. Congratulations?
Princess, I want you to grow up and marry a doctor or a lawyer, someone that can provide for you and take care of you. Shouldn’t all fathers want that for “their” daughter(s)?
Does this mean that all people having a penis and testicles ought to be a doctor or lawyer and/or is this the real reason the Democratic-republicans have relented and allowed same sex practices to be legal - as long as they’re licensed by the State in which they reside?
Yeah I flunked out of medical school, failed the bar so now it’s either celibacy, rob a liquor store or, I’m going Gay.
Monogamy is all about slavery, exclusion and the ownership of people. How do you treat your slaves. Human interest stories. How to get the most out of your slave. Hey I don’t have any slaves how come there’s no stories for me? How come politicians don’t talk about me?Because those that don’t have slaves, are excluded.
And why else should women care about what they look like, aside from being attractive and desirable to someone willing to, pay the price they’re expecting? I’m fat, so everyone should be fat, why should they get paid if I’m not !! it’s impossible to look like Alessandra Ambrosio anyway. I put a lot of time in how I look, so I expect someone that’s, obviously, put in the same and then we can talk price. Butt who has the time? So
Money talks, bullshit walks.
Of course there have been Female Monarchs, female slave owners and female run businesses, but in modern USA times, they all conform to the Patriarchal role model - i.e., I’m at a higher level than you, so you have to wash my poopy undies.
Otherwise why would any woman want to impose such treachery on another?
Aside from breeding, there is no longer any need to make gender distinctions:
Then why is it still, shame on you if you are a woman that refuses to succumb to your Lord/Master/Owner and perform your Moral Imperative to serve as the vessel for the birth of his Man Child[s] and “his” Little Angel Princess[es].
Be a good businessman erm person and make him pay!!
Even if you’re a Lesbian, under the Democratic-republican paradigm, you will end up washing the poopy undies of person(s) at the level above you, and that person might even be another woman.
The most effective way to annihilate gender, is to use Our Federal government to serve Our needs as human beings, rather than serving a small coeterie of businesses and capitalists considered to be “the real americans”, while all the rest of US toil under the Democratic-republican ethos of equal opportunity slavery.
The point here is this -
Even if you are a woman and some electoral solution is reached that purportedly places you on some sort of equal basis with men, you’re still living inside the Democratic-republican paradigm which affects everyone as a human being. Fucked up misery and bullshit affects all of the Proletariat and if you’re Proletariat then that’s all you’re escaping into. You accept that or else you face the Democratic-republican hierarchy:
(1) Proletariat - we live at the shit level -
(2) Petit Bourgeoise - the wanna be “Middle Class” - as a reminder, they reside on platforms just above the shit level
(3) Middle Class - doctors, lawyers, judges, bureaucrats, party apparatchiks, small business owners. The demilitarized zone between the foregoing and
(4) The Real Americans - Absolutely ruthless human beings - the cream of the crop because they don’t care about anyone but themselves and have the money to pay for protection.
Segregation is a binomial proposition used for the sole purpose of USA electoral politics.
You are presently allowing the Democratic-republicans to ruthlessly exploit the foregoing hierarchy by going along with it; most especially, their pseudo moral Holier than Thou bullshit in regards to Free Sex. Charging for it is not a solution it perpetuates the paradigm; and through this process of exploitation the hierarchy itself is perpetuated.
As a Black person, Gay person, woman or whatever category you have been pigeon holed into by the Liberals, you see this injustice and while that is fresh in your mind consider it is them that refer to the carrot and the stick.
After a while you start believing that this injustice is the result of the artificial category you have been placed in - e.g., that if some majority gets elected and/or some law gets passed that you’ll be “free at last”. But the fact is, the only freedom that’s present, is either accepting the Democratic-republican paradigm or seeing that it’s just a carrot and that their only means of having you accept it is with money; take it and boom there goes the stick and you’re trapped inside their paradigm - e.g.,
O I’m so thankful to the Lord for my contract, my family, the US military keeping us free, O Lordy, O Lordy.
There are no race issues, women issues, child issues, ethnic issues, economic issues, labor issues, there are only human issues; but as long as you allow these forms of segregation, created solely by the Democratic-republican single party momolith, either by repeating them, spreading them, making excuses for their existence, then people that believe in the Democratic-republican Party whether their belief is based on the knowledge of what it actually is or whether it’s just blind faith, will have human issues self obscured, which is one of the major purposes and goals of the Democratic-republican Party, not just as a passing whim, but one they consider of utmost importance in regard to National Security.
And that’s how all US Citizens were rendered into the subjects of private business and how we’re “kept” that way .
"The Alcatraz Proclamation" by Indians of All Tribes
Proclamation to the Great White Father and All His People
We, the native Americans, re-claim the land known as Alcatraz Island in the name of all American Indians by right of discovery.
We wish to be fair and honorable in our dealings with the Caucasian inhabitants of this land, and hereby offer the following treaty:
We will purchase said Alcatraz Island for twenty-four dollars ($24) in glass beads and red cloth, a precedent set by the white man’s purchase of a similar island about 300 years ago. We know that $24 in trade goods for these 16 acres is more than was paid when Manhattan Island was sold, but we know that land values have risen over the years. Our offer of $1.24 per acre is greater than the 47¢ per acre that the white men are now paying the California Indians for their land. We will give to the inhabitants of this island a portion of that land for their own, to be held in trust by the American Indian Affairs [sic] and by the bureau of Caucasian Affairs to hold in perpetuity—for as long as the sun shall rise and the rivers go down to the sea. We will further guide the inhabitants in the proper way of living. We will offer them our religion, our education, our life-ways, in order to help them achieve our level of civilization and thus raise them and all their white brothers up from their savage and unhappy state. We offer this treaty in good faith and wish to be fair and honorable in our dealings with all white men.
We feel that this so-called Alcatraz Island is more than suitable for an Indian Reservation, as determined by the white man’s own standards. By this we mean that this place resembles most Indian reservations in that:
1. It is isolated from modern facilities, and without adequate means of transportation.
2. It has no fresh running water.
3. It has inadequate sanitation facilities.
4. There are no oil or mineral rights.
5. There is no industry and so unemployment is very great.
6. There are no health care facilities.
7. The soil is rocky and non-productive; and the land does not support game.
8. There are no educational facilities.
9. The population has always exceeded the land base.
10. The population has always been held as prisoners and kept dependent upon others.
Further, it would be fitting and symbolic that ships from all over the world, entering the Golden Gate, would first see Indian land, and thus be reminded of the true history of this nation. This tiny island would be a symbol of the great lands once ruled by free and noble Indians.
Photo and text via History is a Weapon
Don’t believe the bullshit, life is a full time job.
Hey Darlin’, now that we got our little bird’s nest on the ground, I’m gonna go out an get me a lunch pail. You stay home, make the apple pie and I’ll go out, get a job and bring home the bacon.
Sounds like a plan !!
The man provides and protects, while the woman pops his babies and cleans the man’s poopy undies just like Mommy did.
Hey, it’s in the Bible, you’d better believe it or the Man-God, the epitome of Superman and all that is Good, will rip the flesh from your bones torture torment terrify and drive you fucking insane otherwise.
Well, the Holier Than Thou Liberals seem to Adore it, we know the Conservatives do. So toss the kids in the back seat plastic, throw some fast food burgers at them, let them shit out some nurdles, turn on the big screen, because here’s the Important message:
Everything Is Beautiful …
The kids. The family. Fast food Nurdles and Monogamous sex. Every got dam thing, is just so fucking perfect. Just obey, do your indentured servitude, buy gasmobiles, drive to the retailer, consume in small quantities and do it often, conform, “go with the flow”.
And all you need, in order to have this, is one key; and that key, is the key to happiness, success and everything that is right, proper and sacred about human life and existence.
Surely you’ve noticed that? Because if you haven’t, then it’s time for a checkup and we have a pill for you. There, feel better? You need to rehabilitate and for your 1st programming session, you must repeat this to yourself over and over again: in order to be a complete human being, all that I or anyone else needs, is, a job; and if you don’t have one, well that’s your problem !! Now bite your burger, suck your corn syrup flavored tap water, because it is absolutely essential that Our story continue and be carried on to your progeny (that’s a fancy word for your kids) so let’s get this down:
The Democratics want to give you a job, but the republicans won’t let them :o
Or else !!
The republicans know what to do, so that business will give you a job, but the Democratics won’t let them :o
So according to their own story, the only thing that could ever be wrong in Democratic-republican America can never be solved for everyone. In fact they already guarantee that with the Humphrey Hawkins full employment act, which demands the Fed pull the plug (“take away the punch bowl”) if unemployment dips below 5%. So the best thing that will ever happen, even according to their own story is this:
(1) A job, is the key to happiness and success, but, 5% of all the people in the USA, that want one, shall not, as a matter of Democratic-republican policy, have one;
(2) War making, is the only way the Democratic-republicans can reach bi-partisan consensus on how to supply, a job, for everyone else.
And if the non-independent news, reports an unemployment figure anywhere above 5%? Then we’re all reminded of the foregoing story, one wants to help but the other one won’t let them and war making is the only way both of them make it through the doorframe and across the threshold at the same time.
“What we need is a good war” !!
Or at least war spending like we’re actually having one. And then they shake hands pat each other on the back, belt the Single Malt (or Jameson) and drool down the Lonsdales. That is the totality of their universe and anything outside of it, that is, anything that can’t be utterly obfuscated, is a threat to National Security.
Ever wonder? Are these people from the same planet? Is this where the theory comes from that humans on earth came from outer space? In which case, they’re the humans and all the rest of US are a threat to National Security. I think Newt Gingrich is correct, we need to colonize the moon, and send them there.
So if you live long enough, without self lobotomizing, you shall eventually discover that the Democratic-republican Party:
(1) is the only partisan political “party”, that is allowed to exist under present campaign finance laws, as created by themselves, in the 1970s and
(2) is a congregation of elected persons, neither designed or intended, to do anything, at all, for human beings, unless those human beings happen to own a business.
DELIVER A LABOR FORCE!!
The Democratic-republicans, as the Party of slavery will never get over it and never surrender it because they believe slavery is their God-given right. So the 1st thing they do is: lasso up as many of you, as their private sector masters, need, and then deliver you, to them, as indentured servants.
It’s “equal opportunity slavery”
Why do you think the private sector allows Democratic-republicans to make roads?
Slave and deliver
The way the whole thing is supposed to work is that the Monolith (the Democratic-republican Party) does whatever it can for business and then business is supposed to make work/jobs for everyone except for 5% of all the people that want one.
So the hub of their bullshit is “jobs”, which is to provide for World War to protect US based internationalist business and the retailing and service-consumption Liberal economy.
And every now and then there is some sort of revolt by Labor, and the Democratic-republicans react by increasing “security” - viz., protection for themselves from the masses. Over the years these revolts have been settled with bribery - viz., pay them more money, it seems to calm them down; but now they want retirement pensions too !! OMG what are we going to do !!
It’s the only way to get more people to pay into the tontine. And if you won’t breed, then the Democratic-republicans will have to import kindred or non kindred races, that will breed in your place.
So as more labor was needed, not for actual labor, but merely to pay into the various public and private tontines, issues arose over who would be the breeders - e.g., “we are a white Christian nation”, etc, etc. and eventually women got sucked into the Labor scam, whether they liked it or not. Wouldn’t it be better if the White Christian Women stayed at home as breeders for the production of White Christian babies? Is it a good idea allowing Negro men into the Labor force, who will protect White Christian Women from them.
Breeding, is not only the source of women problems, it’s the source of everyone’s problems. Clearly we already have enough people. There is no need to import more and there is no need to breed more. Stop using celebrities, role models and political campaign litmus tests, to encourage it.
The Biblical Breeding model is obsolete.
Sex can be fun, it doesn’t have to be devoted to breeding and/or require indentured servitude in order to experience and enjoy it. The type of sex specifically designed for breeding is unnecessary; and if you start examining that aspect of sex, itself, then the problems that arise from it become self evident. Most especially, shame for the sexual enjoyment of yourself for any reason other than breeding.
There is no imperative for people to fuck. So why encourage it? We can just enjoy each other’s nakedness, masturbate, do oral sex, just kiss and cuddle naked, maybe fuck a little but why force an orgasm? The only reason a man has to shoot is for the purpose of getting a woman pregnant, the woman doesn’t even have to cum in order for that to happen.
So the social evolution of sex is still happening. The original modern day prudes weren’t necessarily wrong in denouncing sex but were and are wrong in denouncing nudity, masturbation and same sex practices. So why are the former breeding centric practices still being encouraged? The encouragement of breeding is the only explanation, which is also the only explanation for the gender roles that go along with it.
It is nudity, masturbation and same sex practices that ought to be taught and encouraged because people want to cum and enjoy the sexual and erotic nature of human life without having to enter into indentured servitude in order to do so. A breeding centric society is obsolete and is clearly detrimental to the general well being of modern society.
Our government ought to provide for and facilitate the total elimination of all venereal diseases in the USA so that these non breeding forms of sex are as safe as possible.
Photo by Ruslan Lobanov.
Every year I suffer through the hypocrisy.
Now with the GOPstapo I can see, because they’re openly blood thirsty war mongering murderers that essentially hate humanity; but the Liberals market their shit like they’re somehow different.
So every veterans day we get all of this shit - e.g., ‘thank you for keeping us free’.
Free to murder Afghani civilians? The Delta Boys in Nigeria or who knows where else, ask the NY Times, if they’re allowed to tell you.
Or Free, for the sake of business, to ruthlessly exploit humanity. Business = democracy. O we don’t want your land, we just want what’s in it, oil, natural gas, various minerals.
The US military does absolutely nothing for me
and if you look at the US Const., it was never intended to. Since the time of Sam Nunn as USA Senator from Georgia, and his volunteer army, they are essentially professional soldiers or
more accurately, hired guns.
Since they don’t do anything for me and for the most of you nothing as well, it’s most likely that most of this mush comes from several sources
(1) women and/or children that receive benefits from military employees, or dead or disabled soldiers
(2) political advertising
(3) Liberal Representatives and Senators
Because, face it, for the GOPstapo every day is Veteran’s Day until it comes time to pay and/or take care of these guys after they did your dirty deeds for some USA business interest.
Take out a globe and look at it. The only people that would have any chance at fucking with the USA would be Mexicans or Canadians. You don’t need military bases in Iraq to protect yourself against Mexicans stealing your ranch house. The Federalists were more concerned with Canadians, particularly the Roman Catholic ones with their loyalty to the Pope rather than their fellow citizens. Most of those overthrew the Democratic faction of the monolith a long time ago, which was finally openly celebrated with the election of JFK.
And if it wasn’t for FDR having to bribe Southern Reps and Senators to allow him to war against the Nazis, by locating big $$s military assets and bases in their districts, nothing would be there except for a lot of poor white people. Hey Southern Man, who do you think uses your oil? Check it out lQQk at least this is how much they’re willing to admit to.
The US military does absolutely nothing for me
and if you look at the US Const., it was never intended to. Since the time of Sam Nunn as USA Senator from Georgia, and his volunteer army, they are essentially professional soldiers or
more accurately, hired guns.
It’s funny Newt Gingrich doesn’t have his ‘they’re turning America into a European Nation’, over the professional military. They even have their own credit union !! And if you read the Moynihan Report, the “Conservative” plan (white guys that hate Blacks) was to use the largest government employer - the USA military - to train Black guys to be obedient and more like white people.
What the whole thing amounts to is the Liberals inability to get over the boys in uniform coming home from WWII
To be lived over and over and over and over again, with the same bullshit slogans. It’s almost as if the only reason to be President is so you can do the Holier Than Thou tribute to war mongering on Veteran’s Day.
So I thought it was time for someone to tell O’bama and his crew of Liberals that yes President Obama, Sir, the GOPstapo has signed onto the Liberal internationalist perpetual world war plan now too so you can cut the cutesy shit rubbing their face in the fact that they allowed Hitler to go through with the Holocaust; and now maybe encourage people to do something else already hmm?
In conclusion unless you’re for perpetual world war and the occupation of earth by the US military, supporting the troops and all of this other shit that goes with it is just that. To me that is not being a good citizen because you are acting against the true interests of your own fellow citizens for the sake of business and their ruthless exploitation of humanity.
How much debate if any occurs in regard to how much will this cost when a particular war or “military action” is proposed to occur. Not just in terms of how many jobs will it create or save, or how much profit will it secure to facilitate election contributions for “key Congressional districts” (looks, acts and sounds like kickbacks to me), but how much will it cost in terms of caring for the wounded, for infrastructure, depletion of limited resources, other casualties and damages?
Maybe there is that debate, but it’s never reported. Can we get out of our indentured servitude to private business in order to investigate this ourselves, via C-SPAN or the Congressional Record?
But not to worry, here again, are the Liberals (and their wanna be Conservatives) “we don’t have time, this is critical, we must act now” !!
Critical to whom?
Just stay calm, because the Liberals already have all of that covered too, with their famed “War Powers Resolution”. So anything short of what the ‘not independent press’ can convince you ‘isn’t really a war; doesn’t actually require prior Congressional approval’; or is just self defense - e.g., military bases in Iraq to protect your ranch house from Mexicans invading Texas or Arizona; and regardless of how The Law Of Nations defines aggressive actions, otherwise; but who even knows or has time to know what the law of nations is? It’s time for us to drive to the nearest foodliner, buy in small quantities and buy often, stop at Burger King or McDonalds and then down load a movie.
“There you see tommy; not to worry; just go about your business; there’s nothing for you to be concerned with here; news programming will explain the whole thing later, if you have time” - some Liberal or Conservative.
The alternative is, grow the fuck up: open your eyes, use logic and common sense, quit being duped by these assholes and let’s move the fuck on already.
Zen is “the Art of Living”. To recognize our absolute reliance on earth, the time and commonality we share with all living things, the most effective use of resources according to our actual needs and to conduct our use and life in a just and peaceful manner. The best way to describe the USA under Democratic-republicans is, “anti-Zen”.
But what good is it to even make such a statement unless a considerable number of people reading this know what Zen is?
USA “internationalism”, which may be historically defined as the US government coming out of the Closet and formally proclaiming anti-neutrality, has devolved to the making of offensive war, nuclear extortion and spying. Explaining this as if it had or has any foundation of reason is like saying “intelligent design” is a proven fact, which immediately infers the true reality of the whole thing - viz.,
USA Internationalist policy, is what Democratic-republicans believe in. They send out more and more missionaries, until their “policy action” is a “Holy War” against any that dare oppose them.
Everytime I think about this, the memory that immediately comes to mind are former neighbors that would attempt to insinuate the vicinage into their domestic squabbles, as if we could really give a shit other than being unjustly annoyed and imposed on. But then someone would call the Police and unless the man was actually rolling around in the middle of the street like he did on one occasion and solely for attention, the Police wouldn’t do anything. This was before the mandatory arrest laws for domestic quarrels were enacted in NYS.
The man wanted external persons to choose sides in his domestic quarrel and if that could be achieved then he could use that to convince his family that he’s the good guy. He wins.
So this scenario perfectly depicts my World View of USA Internationalism, Democratic-republicans taking their disappointments in life resulting from their own domestic problems and then imposing them on the world, except there’s no police.
Quite by accident, I came across this peculiar redefintion of neorealism cf.neorealism*:
Apparently the Walt Disney Company happened to make yet another propaganda piece libeling the journalist Julian Assange and Wiki-Leaks; the latter, possibly the only Non governmental service that actually serves the informational needs of The People, whom by immediate inference, is the only true source of sovereignty. Julian Assange as a reporter, is someone that the USA ought to just leave alone, so I wanted to say something about this, but my pre-occupation with house painting throughout most of October, as opposed to writing, left me lapse for proper words.
While reading the foregoing article the film “Lore” (available for Netflix streaming) came to mind in the way the film depicted common German Hitler worshipers, in re The Holocaust: which (according to the film) they denied and refused to believe that Hitler could be capable of doing such things, so they attributed reports of it, with photographs, to “American propaganda”.
According to Twombly, either side is “plausible”, so who is your good/guy bad guy.
O that’s easy, tommy, the good guy is the guy that always wins!!
Not only O’Bama but even McCain hates Julian Assange, so he must be the bad guy; which means that he has to lose - viz., Domestic Public Opinion must be turned against him (same as with Manning, Snowden et al).
At 1st glance, the depiction in “Lore” as well as my depiction of Walt Disney might appear as simple denial - e.g., come on tommy he’s the bad guy admit it. Think of the myriad voices of conformist approbation that will stand behind you (before you and along side you; maybe even trampling you to death) but instead, it made me think that people do not want to view their existence in terms of neorealism (Visconti) but instead want to think of their existence in terms of “good guy/bad guy”. Aside from this idea seeming to be the ultimate Human Perversion, it also presents a sort of paradox which I have referred to as, “The Grand Dichotomy”, which is actually the policy action of the good guy/bad guy paradigm - viz., everything is divided into two sides.
It’s belief by faith, before the facts.
And it’s something everyone either blindly accepts as human reality or if they live long enough under it’s imposition, they will be depicted as having chosen sides; and thus, depriving themselves of life in any alternative form or else, being forcibly denied it under color of National “authority”. This too is what happened to people in the USA after the Democratic-republicans denounced Neutrality.
They’re still reacting to their own intrigue.
The problem with this definition of neorealism cf.neorealism is that the USA has no self interest; because the Democratic-republicans, with their Thomas Jefferson, State Rights, Kentucky Resolutions, have made National Self Interest, seemingly impossible. So what we have instead are a considerable number of private business-people acting in their own self interest, internationally, under protection of the US military - e.g.,
You passed a law that says you have to rely on us to pay for your political advertising? Yes. Ok, then, if you protect our self interests then we’ll fund your elections otherwise we’ll fund the election of the ones that will. Under this undeniable reality, which was willfully, intentionally and knowingly created by the Democratic-republicans (the citizens united decision in part merely reports what Congress created): the best that can possibly happen and what has happened is that the Democratic-republicans, have merely adopted the self interests of various business in order to secure funding for elections and then merely refer to those various business interests as US National interests.
It’s like Calvin Coolidge said, “America’s business is business”. And because the USA has no business of it’s own, it’s place on the “internationalist” world stage is to protect various USA based businesses doing whatever they want, anywhere they want, which The Party either takes as sovereignty -e.g., people aren’t sovereign businesses are; or else The Party just don’t give a shit, and just does it for the money.
Facts are the only means for escape.
*FN 11/14/13 - in re neo-realism (Visconti) the easiest way to identify the distinguishing characteristic is that neo-realist films do not have happy endings. They involve some sort of struggle against insurmountable obstacles or injustices and at the point where the Hollywood/Fascist happy ending would come, failure results, leaving the leading character with some tragic loss and generally ending up in the same situation they were in before the struggle began. In this regard the films actually serve as a metaphor for the way things actually turn out in real life; and in that regard the story merely serves as a vehicle for the characteristic resolve.